My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-00442 - pool
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
D
>
Deborah Drive
>
420 Deborah Drive - 31-118-23-23-0009
>
Permits/Inspections
>
2013-00442 - pool
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:30:06 PM
Creation date
6/15/2016 10:44:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
420
Street Name
Deborah
Street Type
Drive
Address
420 Deborah Drive
Document Type
Permits/Inspections
PIN
3111823230009
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br /> On Oct 10, 2012, at 3:57 PM, Mike Gaffron <MGaffron(c�ci.orono.mn.us> wrote: <br /> Rachaelle— <br /> I sent this to you last Friday—don't know why you didn't get it. Here it is again. <br /> Mike <br /> Michael P. Gaffron <br /> Assistant City Administrator/Long Term Strategy <br /> City of Orono <br /> (Street Address) 2750 Kelley Parkway <br /> (Mailing Address) P.O. Box 66, Crvstal Bay , MN 55323 <br /> Phone: (952) 249-4600 <br /> Fax: (952) 249-4616 <br /> From: Mike Gaffron <br /> Sent: Friday, October O5, 2012 10:18 AM <br /> To: 'rachaelle48(a�hotmail.com' <br /> Cc: Melanie Curtis; Jessica Loftus <br /> Subject: Re: Buffer - 420 Deborah Drive /Pool Permit <br /> Rachaelle - <br /> Mark Perry has discussed the issue of wetland classification with Catherine Bach at the <br /> Watershed District (MCWD). Here is my analysis of the situation: <br /> Your wetland is currently classified as a Preserve management category, which requires a 50- <br /> foot buffer. <br /> Because your proposed construction activity meets all the Code criteria that triggers <br /> establishment of a buffer, the 50-foot buffer is required to be established. Those criteria are: 1) <br /> the area of the pool construction drains toward the wetland; 2)the amount of grading activity <br /> associated with the pool exceeds 50 cubic yards (it's actually more than 100 cubic yards); and 3) <br /> the pool results in a net increase in the square footage of impervious surface that drains toward <br /> the wetland. Unfortunately there is no provision in the Code that would negate any of these <br /> factors just because the pool is 350 feet from the wetland. <br /> Your wetland delineator, Wayne Jacobsen, staked out the edge of the wetland approximately 16 <br /> feet south of the rock wall. The City's consultant wetland expert, Mark Perry of Bolton & Menk, <br /> was on the site and he agrees with Wayne's staked location of the wetland boundary. <br /> We discussed the possibility that the current classification of the wetland as a Preserve category <br /> might be incorrect. The only way to get it changed to some lower category would be to perform <br /> a"MnRAM Assessment" which must be performed by a wetland expert. Catherine Bach <br /> indicated MCWD will not perform the MnRAM assessment, but would review an assessment <br /> performed by someone else. You would have to have your wetland delineator do the MnRAM <br /> assessment. <br /> Your goal in having that MnRAM assessment completed would be to have the wetland <br /> reclassified to a lesser management category than Preserve, such as Manage 1, Manage 2, or <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.