My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-1991 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
10-21-1991 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 9:04:25 AM
Creation date
2/28/2012 9:04:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF OCTOBER 21, 1991 <br />• #1694 - CONT. <br />Mabusth advised that the earlier setback variance for the deck <br />did not include such future limitations. Mabusth reiterated <br />there is a 21' separation from the traveled road to the lot line. <br />Mabusth noted approval should be conditioned upon the doorway <br />leading to the current lower level bedroom being changed to an <br />archway in order to insure only a three bedroom house to protect <br />the mound septic system. <br />It was moved by Moos, <br />Application #1694 for <br />street setback to <br />conditioned upon the <br />to be converted to a <br />use classification as <br />seconded by Cohen, to recommend approval of <br />Douglas Merz, 3195 Watertown Road, for side <br />construction an addition, approval is <br />doorway to the existing lower level bedroom <br />den being changed to an archway to insure <br />a three bedroom home. Ayes 6, nays 0. <br />(413) #1696 STEPHEN AND JOANIE WARD, <br />4695 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - <br />VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 9:36 -10:06 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was <br />noted. <br />Stephen and Joanie Ward were present. <br />IS Mabusth explained applicants are seeking a street setback and 75- <br />250' hardcover variances for a multi -level addition. They are <br />proposing a 10' street setback. Applicants are granted <br />allowances to the height restrictions because of the slope of the <br />lot. <br />Ward explained that they first requested a detached garage to <br />keep it away from the house, but the County preferred the garage <br />to be located parallel with the road and therefore it needed to <br />abut the house which lead to the incorporation of the proposed <br />addition. He noted that the proposed garage floor is at the same <br />elevation as the roadway, and footings would have to be installed <br />to match those of the existing house, so they decided to use the <br />underground space as living space. He then noted that to match <br />the roof lines, the garage would need to be extended upward and <br />they decided to make this a master bedroom. Ward stated that <br />their current residence has a footprint of 550 s.f. <br />Chair Kelley advised that they are increasing hardcover from <br />19.9% to 35% which is a huge increase for a garage. He noted the <br />garage at 35x23' could be reduced by eliminating the enclosed <br />stairways. <br />Bellows asked what the lot size is. <br />Mabusth stated it is approximately 11,000 in the 1 acre zone. <br />is Ward realized that the addition is adding to the construction <br />cost, but feel they are gaining a greater benefit in the long <br />run. <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.