My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/19/03 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
05/19/03 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 3:47:01 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 3:47:01 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,May 19, 2003 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#7 #03-2893 JOHN AND ROBERTA HENRICH, Continued) <br /> Rahn stated that the Commission would ask the applicant to remove the old shed in the 0- <br /> 75' setback and replace it with a lockbox. <br /> Henrich stated that he believed the steep grade provided them with adequate hardship to <br /> also keep the shed. <br /> Hawn concurred with Rahn regarding the shed. <br /> While Gaffron stated that, if money was not an issue, someone could change the grade, the <br /> access, and the entire character of the property to make the design conforming, he <br /> questioned whether that should be the goal of the Commission. He added that parking is <br /> an issue for residents along Highwood and the added space they have serves a use to the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> Chair Smith questioned whether the necessary changes to make it conforming would <br /> require exorbitant amounts of fill. <br /> Gaffron indicated that it would require a lot of fill to change the property, which, in turn, <br /> could create drainage issues. <br /> Bremer questioned how cutting the size of the home down to meet requirements would <br /> work. <br /> At merely 1600 s.f., Henrich maintained that cutting the house down an extra 100-200 s.f. <br /> would not impact hardcover significantly,but would impact their livability. <br /> While he did not feel the size of the home to be an issue, Rahn felt that other removals <br /> were warranted. He suggested that they remove the shed, design a smaller deck, and <br /> remove some of the driveway hardcover. He agreed that the topography of the property <br /> presented a hardship. <br /> While she concurred, Bremer stated that they would need to be clear that it was the steep <br /> elevations that presented the hardship, unlike the Toth's whose project warranted a basic <br /> redesign. <br /> Rahn stated that, short of regrading the entire topography of the site, they could not <br /> redesign the application. <br /> Hawn encouraged the applicants to find additional hardcover removals. <br /> PAGE 26 of 39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.