Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, May 19, 2003 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#5 #03-2889 RAVIA REAL ESTATE,LLC, Continued) <br /> 4. Additional screening is added along north and northeast boundaries of site <br /> to buffer from adjacent residential uses. <br /> 5. Applicant is suggesting the new plan has 42,000 s.f. gross square footage <br /> but contains only 21,000 net square feet for parking calculation purposes. <br /> Using ITE standards, applicant suggests parking needs are 2.79 stalls per <br /> 1000 s.f of gross floor space; 2.79 x 42,000/1,000 yields a 114 stall <br /> requirement. Gaffron stated that he was comfortable with 10 stalls per unit. <br /> 6. Applicant has had discussions with the City Engineer and Public Services <br /> Director regarding the grades for the service road and parking areas. The <br /> grades recommended by the City Engineer provide difficulties for designing <br /> the walkout concept proposed. Although applicant has indicated that they <br /> will accept the `approval of the City Engineer' as a condition of approval, <br /> we do not have a revised plan that meets the City Engineer's <br /> recommendations. <br /> 7. Applicants have had discussions with the manager of the Orono Shopping <br /> Center and have gained his general agreement to a 20' driveway connection <br /> to the north end of the property, subject to no runoff additions to the OSC <br /> property. <br /> After reviewing 16 issues for discussion, Gaffron indicated that the plan revisions would <br /> appear to be addressing some of the major concerns brought up by the public and the <br /> Planning Commission at the April meeting. <br /> Gaffron reported that staff believes the mix of owned/leased office spaces proposed is an <br /> appropriate and relatively low-intensity use of this site as compared to other possible B-6 <br /> uses. The design of the buildings is attractive and of a residential character. Staff is less <br /> concerned about the parking needs given the reduction in units and the data supplied. We <br /> still need to consider potential traffic flow impacts to the adjacent commercial use. <br /> Despite applicant's hope that the road grades can be worked out to allow the walkout use <br /> intended, the proposed road and parking lot grades are still an issue, and applicant should <br /> be advised to submit a revised grading plan addressing the City Engineer's <br /> recommendations. <br /> Planning Commission should address and if possible reach a final conclusion on site <br /> planning issues, including but not necessarily limited to the following: <br /> a) Is the scale and character of the buildings appropriate for the site, in terms of: <br /> - appropriate intensity of use and resultant impacts to surrounding properties, <br /> traffic, etc. <br /> -building setbacks, height, number of stories <br /> -basement/walkout exposure and elevation views <br /> - driveway layout, site access, interior circulation <br /> PAGE 18 of 39 <br />