My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/21/03 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
04/21/03 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 3:46:20 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 3:46:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,April 21,2003 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS <br /> (#12) REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES <br /> ATTENDING COUNCIL MEETINGS OF MARCH 24 AND APRIL 14,2003 <br /> Fritzler reported that all of the Planning Commission items were on the Council consent <br /> agenda for the evening of March 24, 2003. <br /> Hawn reported that the April 14, 2003 meeting consisted of the Bichanich application <br /> which was deemed a conforming lot. <br /> Gaffron indicated that Bottenberg was directed by the City Council to compile a survey of <br /> lots which exist in the 1 acre and 2 acre zoning district. He questioned how wide a home <br /> should be allowed to get when it's being built on a 100' lot in certain zoning districts. With <br /> regard to Bichanich, the City Attorney cautioned the Council that they not create a new <br /> code allowing side yard setback variances where no hardship exists on a conforming lot. <br /> Bottenberg reminded the Commission that when an applicant maximizes the size of their <br /> house to meet the 1,500 structural coverage allowance, they oftentimes realize they have <br /> not left any room for a driveway in their calculations. She maintained that the house needs <br /> to be reduced to allow for the driveway, not the other way around, maximizing and then <br /> asking for a driveway variance. <br /> Fritzler felt that, while 50' lots offer built in hardships due to size, consideration should be <br /> given to the variance process for 100'+lots in a '/2 acre or 2 acre zoning district. <br /> Gaffron agreed that, from a staff perspective, it is much more difficult to hold people to a <br /> standard when there is no set standard or a division between rebuild versus remodel. <br /> Rahn suggested the Commission consider eliminating the 1,500 s.f. structural coverage <br /> figure in lieu of a straight percentage. <br /> (#13) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION <br /> Gaffron reminded the Commission that a work session was scheduled for May 7, 2003 at <br /> 5:30 P.M. He encouraged the Commissioners to consider making a motion for debate in <br /> order to focus the Commission efforts in a timely manner. <br /> Chair Smith indicated that she would be attending the Growing Smart in Minnesota <br /> seminar on June 10 and asked others to consider joining her. <br /> PAGE 39 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.