My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/21/03 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
04/21/03 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 3:46:20 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 3:46:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,April 21, 2003 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#3 #03-2876 SEVIE LANNING, Continued) <br /> 7. 285 s.f. (28.64%) hardcover within the 75' to 250' lakeshore setback zone <br /> where 248.75 s.f. (25%) is permitted. <br /> Chaput reported that this application was tabled at the 3/17/2003 Planning Commission <br /> meeting for the applicant to provide elevations of the proposed home. At the meeting, <br /> concerns were voiced regarding the proposed encroachment into the average lakeshore <br /> setback and how the height of the home might affect the neighbor's lake views. The <br /> Planning Commission also found it difficult to determine if additional hardcover may be <br /> necessary(for sidewalks, door landings, etc.) without elevation views of the proposed <br /> home. New plans have now been provided for review. <br /> Chaput presented three alternatives for consideration by the Planning Commission. <br /> Alternative 1: Proposed footprint(40' x 30'), which leaves a driveway only 10-12' deep <br /> Alternative 2: Reduce the footprint of the house to 33' x 30' to meet the existing average <br /> lakeshore setback, leaves a 16' depth driveway <br /> Alternative 3: Move the proposed footprint 5' toward the rear lot line (south), leaving <br /> 16'-17' depth off the traveled roadway <br /> Dimensions Permitted Existing Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 <br /> Setback from 75' 49' 48' 50' 53' <br /> OHWL <br /> Rear Setback 30' 0' 10' 10' 5' <br /> Side Setbacks <br /> East 10' 0' 10' 10' 10' <br /> West 10' 17' 10' 10' 10' <br /> Average Lakeshore n/a 9' 16' 9' 8'-11' <br /> Setback <br /> Encroachment <br /> Hardcover in None 1,059 s.f. 1,121 s.f. 1,024 s.f. 1,029 s.f. <br /> 0-75' Setback Zone (38.6%) (40.82%) (37.29%) (37.47%) <br /> Hardcover in 75'- 248.75 s.f. 779 s.f. 285 s.f. 285 s.f. 420 s.f. <br /> 250' Setback Zone (25%) (78.29%) (28.64%) (28.64%) (42.21%) <br /> With regard to the rear setback and culvert relocation, Chaput stated that the property to <br /> the south of the lot is owned by the Hennepin County Rail Authority for potential use as a <br /> regional trail in the future. Since this property does not have the potential to be developed <br /> by structures, a substandard setback from the rear lot line would not negatively impact the <br /> property owners to the south. Chaput noted that an existing storm sewer culvert that runs <br /> directly beneath the existing home, extending from the pond on the south side of the <br /> PAGE 2 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.