Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,April 21, 2003 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#5 #03-2881 CURTIS AND KATHLEEN MIDTHUN, Continued) <br /> the two adjacent properties. It was felt that the proposed additions would have little impact <br /> on the views enjoyed by 2965 Casco Point Road. <br /> With the existing foundation removed and a new one to be constructed to accommodate the <br /> one story addition above it, Bottenberg stated that it is staff s opinion that this would <br /> provide the City an opportunity to have the residence conform to the required side yard <br /> setback of 10'. After reviewing the application and hardship, Bottenberg noted that staff <br /> does not see a substantial hardship which would justify the side yard setback variance. <br /> Mr. Midthun stated that, since purchasing the home in 2000, they have worked to preserve <br /> the character of the cottage home, while striving to make it more livable. Currently,he <br /> pointed out that the kitchen is minimal and they would like to add to it and improve it. <br /> While they would be replacing the foundation and giving the lot line a bit of relief, Mr. <br /> Midthun indicated that they need the space for the new kitchen. <br /> Chair Smith inquired about drainage issues. <br /> Mr. Midthun stated that they had no drainage issues in the past, even when a mere 1.3' to <br /> the lot line. <br /> Mr. Bricko indicated that the drainage should improve with the new plans, as the surveyor <br /> had recommended they direct water using a swale and perhaps drain tile as well. He stated <br /> that they would work with staff to create an acceptable drainage plan. <br /> Chair Smith indicated that she had no problem granting the average lakeshore setback <br /> variance due to the subdivision. <br /> Mrs. Gallistel, 2933 Casco Point Road, the northwest neighbor supported the neighbors <br /> application and did not even see the need to move the old garage. <br /> Eric Berg, 2965 Casco Point Road, stated that he would not have a problem supporting a 5' <br /> side yard setback along their property line. He liked the proposal. <br /> Although she could support the application, Chair Smith was hesitant to grant the side yard <br /> setback. <br /> Since the foundation would be replaced, Fritzler indicated that he would support the 10' <br /> side yard setback as recommended by staff. <br /> Mabusth asked if the additions or home could be slid back further to the north to allow <br /> more room. <br /> PAGE 10 of 40 <br />