My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/17/03 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
03/17/03 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 3:24:16 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 3:24:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, March 17, 2003 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#03-2867 DANIEL ADAMS, Continued) <br /> that he was at a loss of what to do, he did not wish to lose trees, which he felt added value <br /> to his property. <br /> Berg concurred that the driveway contained excessive hardcover and that no bay should be <br /> allowed. She questioned the removal of the screen porch and deck altogether. <br /> Fritzler agreed that hardcover needed to be reduced somehow. <br /> Chair Smith felt that,removal of excessive hardcover, was in line with what the <br /> Commission has required of applicants in the past. <br /> Rahn stated that, typically, all that is allowed is the original footprint of a home, plus <br /> minimal driveway. While he was willing to bend with regard to the massing and 0-75' <br /> setback, he felt that more could be done with the driveway to reduce hardcover. <br /> Hawn asked how much more or less roofline there was in the new design. <br /> Alexander stated that, comparatively, the pitch is 12/12 versus 3/12. She indicated that the <br /> overhang is less than what exists currently and that the bay window falls within the <br /> overhang, and makes up a significant part of the design. <br /> Chair Smith indicated that the consensus among the Planning Commission seemed to be to <br /> reduce hardcover in the 75-250', closer to what's required. She asked staff whether the <br /> Commission should see the proposal once again or approve it with contingencies. <br /> Rahn encouraged the applicant to work with staff on the driveway reductions. <br /> Although Gaffron felt they could make the appropriate reductions, he questioned whether <br /> the applicant would agree to them. <br /> Adams argued that, if the Commissioners lived in his home, they would see that the <br /> driveway is truly not excessive for the lot. He reiterated his desire to save the trees that <br /> make his property valuable. <br /> Fritzler stated that even emergency vehicles can usually back in and out of tight spots. <br /> Gaffron suggested elongating the greenspace in the middle circle, which would eliminate <br /> triangles of hardcover from the driveway. He felt this could be a good alternative for the <br /> applicant to diminish hardcover while adding grass for greenspace. <br /> Chair Smith stated that, often in Orono, tradeoffs or changes are required. <br /> PAGE 4 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.