My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/17/03 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
03/17/03 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 3:24:16 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 3:24:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, March 17, 2003 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#4) #03-2875 SANDRA ANN BENSON, 1376 BALDUR PARK ROAD,VARIANCE <br /> 7:45-7:55 P.M. <br /> Sandra Benson, Applicant, Wes Sampson, the Architect, and Dan Larkin, the General <br /> Contractor, were present. <br /> Chaput reported that the applicant was requesting variances to reconstruct and expand the <br /> roof of an existing principal structure and replace windows and doors on the second story. <br /> The required variances would include principal structure located 25.1' from the OHWL of <br /> Lake Minnetonka where 75' is required, a side yard setback of 6.6' with a 1' overhang <br /> encroachment where 10' is required, and a 48.7' encroachment into the average lakeshore <br /> setback <br /> Chaput explained that neither the footprint of the structure nor the hardcover was proposed <br /> to change with the roof expansion. She stated that the applicant proposes to remove a <br /> portion of the existing roof of the original structure and replace it with one continuous <br /> ridge, approximately 14"higher than the existing roof structure, or 1'10"below the <br /> roofline attached to the west. The exact height may vary within inches from what is <br /> proposed once the structure is worked out. Chaput indicated that the structure was not <br /> proposed to be closer to the OHWL than what exists currently. <br /> With regard to the structural engineer's report, Chaput reported that the engineer reviewed <br /> the proposed roof reconstruction and found that the existing foundation and walls can <br /> support the proposed work. The extent of the proposed work includes replacement of <br /> some windows, doors and walls on the second story of the house. Chaput indicated that the <br /> first story of the structure and other portions of the home will not be modified as a result of <br /> this proposal. <br /> After reviewing the issues for consideration, Chaput stated that staff recommends approval <br /> of the requested variances to reconstruct and expand the roof of the existing principal <br /> structure with two conditions mentioned in the memo dated February 25, 2003. <br /> Benson commented that they hoped to obtain more living space from the remodel. <br /> Chair Smith stated that, in her opinion, the remodel will be more attractive and that she had <br /> no difficulty approving the application. <br /> Rahn questioned the need for further screening , since the elevation change was so minor <br /> to cause the need for more screening. <br /> Hawn asked if the applicant objected to planting more trees. <br /> Benson stated that she could plant additional trees. <br /> PAGE 10 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.