My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-18-2002 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
11-18-2002 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 3:11:35 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 3:11:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, November 18, 2002 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#9) #02-2854 KEVIN MANLEY, 1973 FAGERNESS POINT ROAD, Continued <br /> Manley asked what the City considered an acceptable slope, 3:1 or 2 1/2:1. <br /> Gaffron indicated that he would not identify what the right slope would be for this <br /> application before spending considerable more time with the Engineer. He stated that, <br /> now that the City has a plan to work from, they could move forward in addressing its <br /> points. <br /> Manley asked whether they could put a deadline on the discussion. <br /> Bremer stated that the next City Council meeting would be December 9, 2002, if they <br /> could address the concerns by then. <br /> Manley repeated his frustration over the lengthy process. <br /> Chair Smith stated that she had difficulty believing that this many issues could get <br /> resolved by December 9. She was hesitant to move this forward to Council with so many <br /> open ended issues. <br /> Hawn reminded the Commission that the applicant had asked them to vote up or down on <br /> this incomplete application tonight. <br /> Rahn stated that, specifically, #6 would need to be changed a great deal if they wanted <br /> City Council support. <br /> Chair Smith cautioned the applicant that the City Council might send the application back <br /> to the Planning Commission for further discussion. <br /> Bremer stated that the applicant would not be losing any time by moving forward to <br /> Council at this time, since the Planning Commission would not be meeting again until <br /> mid January. <br /> Gaffron questioned whether the work would begin during the winter months even if the <br /> applicant were to get approval. <br /> Suarez indicated that it would depend what work and which contractor the applicants <br /> chose to do the work. He believed a reputable contractor with the right equipment, who <br /> knew how to use boulders could begin sooner than later. <br /> PAGE 26 of 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.