My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-18-2002 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
11-18-2002 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 3:11:35 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 3:11:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, November 18, 2002 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#8) #02-2853 AULIK DESIGN CORP., 955 TONKAWA ROAD, Continued <br /> Mabusth inquired whether accessory structures, like pools,were allowed within the <br /> average lakeshore setback. <br /> Gaffron stated that the pool should be included in the approval. <br /> Mabusth agreed, stating the pool has been included in all the drawings. <br /> Aulik stated that they have been requesting the pool in the setback all along. He noted <br /> that the pool and al of its hardcover have been included in the hardcover requests from <br /> the beginning. <br /> Chair Smith asked if the Planning Commission could approve the application subject to <br /> the City Engineer's approval. <br /> Rahn stated that he was hesitant to send something to Council without exact dimensions. <br /> Gaffron maintained that the pool would not be an issue with regard to the average <br /> lakeshore setback since it is in ground. <br /> Loraine Kaley, 1395 Brown Road South, asked how many feet the driveway was from <br /> the neighboring property and where the potential runoff would come from. <br /> Aulik pointed out that the distance was 70'-80' between the driveway and property line, <br /> with a 20% grade change. He stated that landscape at this grade could be maintained. <br /> Chair Smith noted that a recommendation from the Planning Commission should be <br /> accompanied by a swale drainage plan. She asked if Aulik had any further comment. <br /> Aulik asked what they would be required to supply the City with regard to drafting a new <br /> easement description. <br /> Gaffron stated that the applicant should provide the City with a certified copy of the <br /> easement so that staff can determine the most efficient method to change the legal <br /> description. <br /> In order to be consistent, Mabusth asked if the hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone could <br /> be removed. <br /> Bottenberg clarified that there is 10.9 s.f. of hardcover within the 0-75' setback, which <br /> consists of a planter, and a 77 s.f retaining wall which could likely be removed. <br /> PAGE 12 of 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.