Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, October 21,2002 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#14) #02-2840 DAHLSTROM DEVELOPMENT LLC, 2550 KELLEY PARKWAY, <br /> Continued <br /> Mabusth asked if the water would be chemically treated. <br /> Johnston stated that there should be enough movement as to not require chemicals as they've <br /> planned it. <br /> Chair Smith asked if there were additional comments. <br /> Gaffron stated that the application was slated for the November 12, 2002 City Council meeting at <br /> which time he would try to put together a 1st draft of developers agreement and resolution, with <br /> a similar degree of detail as the concept plan. He reiterated to the Commission that if they had <br /> any further comments to speak now. <br /> Fritzler questioned the future bus stop site. <br /> Johnston pointed out that the MnDOT site would be the most logical space for a bus stop. <br /> Fritzler asked if there was fear that people might use this as a park and ride area. <br /> Johnston indicated that the parking time could be limited. <br /> Gaffron stated that there could be a separate space for a future bus park and ride later. <br /> With regard to the drawings, Chair Smith asked what would go at the other ends of the MnDOT <br /> trails. <br /> Gaffron stated that these would be developed sites. <br /> Johnston indicated that the applicants were pretty flexible and went to MnDOT to ask for <br /> everything they might need now rather than going back for more later. <br /> Hawn questioned whether the Commission could take action subject to further information from <br /> the traffic study and affordable housing issues have been addressed. <br /> Gaffron stated that they could make their motion and include a recommendation which gives the <br /> City Council further direction. <br /> Hawn asked if there was a need to make a motion regarding the rezoning and RPUD, or merely <br /> final development plan approval, which makes references to the Commission's feelings.. <br /> Gaffron indicated that the rezoning was treated as inherent in the process of the concept plan <br /> approvals. He pointed out that the phasing of fees was also something that the Commission did <br /> not discuss, however, would be included in the final resolution put before the City Council. <br /> Page 28 <br />