My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-2002 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
10-21-2002 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 3:42:59 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 3:08:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, October 21,2002 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#14) #02-2840 DAHLSTROM DEVELOPMENT LLC, 2550 KELLEY PARKWAY, <br /> Continued <br /> Hawn questioned how this might affect stacking problems on Highway 12. <br /> Johnson stated that he did not foresee any stacking or cueing problems at the intersection, in fact, <br /> he pointed out that the new highway redevelopment of 12 would alleviate traffic on the current <br /> highway by 40%. <br /> Berg inquired whether the future commercial development was taken into consideration when <br /> they looked at the traffic that would be created on Kelley Parkway, Willow, and Highway 12. <br /> Johnson indicated that they take everything into consideration when they make their projections. <br /> Gaffron asked what Johnson foresaw for the Highway 12 and Willow intersection. <br /> Johnson stated that they recommend the City widen Willow to make access safer and create a <br /> center turn lane along Willow. <br /> Gaffron questioned the recommendation for the Willow and County Road 6 intersection. <br /> Since the intersection already meets traffic signal warrants, Johnson suggested the City approach <br /> the County to try to get an all way stop sign installed. He agreed this was a hazardous <br /> intersection. <br /> Mabusth asked what the off site needs for this development might entail and how dependent on <br /> the MnDOT improvements, of the sewer lines along the railway and lake, the developer would <br /> be. <br /> Gaffron maintained that the City's expectation is that the MnDOT corridor work is slated for <br /> completion by next summer, at which time, the sewer line upgrades would come between <br /> Highway 12 and the corridor. By the time these units would come on board, Gaffron stated they <br /> would have the capacity to handle them. <br /> Kellogg stated that it has been known for some time that improvements would need to be made, <br /> and until MnDOT completes its work, the temporary lift station could handle some of the <br /> development units temporarily. He believed the timing looked as if it should all work out. <br /> Mabusth reminded the applicant that a stormwater retention pond was necessary, and asked if <br /> any other improvements were needed off site for this development. <br /> While he acknowledged that the applicant had already addressed needed improvements, Kellogg <br /> indicated that the only difficulty is that the discharge from the ponds has to run across Highway <br /> 12, take a 90 degree turn to the west, and another 90 degree turn to get to the swales that carries <br /> it back to the railroad tracks, at little or no grade. <br /> Page 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.