My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-2002 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
10-21-2002 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 3:42:59 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 3:08:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, October 21,2002 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#14) #02-2840 DAHLSTROM DEVELOPMENT LLC, 2550 KELLEY PARKWAY, <br /> Continued <br /> Gaffron began with a brief overview of the eight topics that the Planning Commission was <br /> requested to review in order to make recommendations to the Council. The eight issues were as <br /> follows: <br /> 1) Acceptability of site layout <br /> 2) Acceptability of building styles and proposed materials and color palettes <br /> 3) Acceptability of provisions for pedestrian circulation, accessibility, and connectivity <br /> 4) Acceptability of recreation amenities, both private and public <br /> 5) Recommendations on site lighting as well as Kelley Parkway streetscape and lighting <br /> 6) Acceptability of overall landscape plan <br /> 7) Recommendations regarding housing affordability <br /> 8) Recommendations regarding development covenants <br /> The Planning Commission was encouraged to identify any further issues and recommend <br /> revisions or changes as they saw fit. Gaffron noted that the applicants have requested that the <br /> Planning Commission make their recommendation to Council for Council action on November <br /> 12 in order to meet the applicant's schedule. Once again, Gaffron stated that any <br /> recommendation for approval should include a recommendation that the applicants work with <br /> staff to resolve outstanding engineering and other related issues noted in the memo or those that <br /> come to light in the future. <br /> Gaffron pointed out that both Tom Kellogg and Shelly Johnson, of Bonestroo were present to <br /> provide comment on engineering issues and the traffic study. <br /> With regard to streets and trails, Gaffron stated that there were minor revisions for discussion, he <br /> pointed out that there was a separate entrance and exit road at the main entrance, a circular <br /> structure in the middle of the development, a new southeast end access for emergency vehicles, <br /> and that the suggested 15' separation between loft buildings had been achieved for the most part. <br /> He maintained that further discussion would be needed to address the consolidation of the loft <br /> accesses. While they were still working on specific engineering issues, the Fire Marshall did not <br /> have too many concerns other than tweaking hydrant locations. As indicated in the staff memo, <br /> and after speaking to Consultant Case, Gaffron stated that Case's feeling was that this was a nice <br /> landscape plan, which exceeds the general requirements. <br /> Since the Commission was familiar with the application, Chair Smith suggested that rather than <br /> have Gaffron review the entire staff memo, he take questions with regard to each issue. <br /> Chair Smith stated that she was pleased with the plan and asked Johnston if he could identify any <br /> similar housing units elsewhere, that she could preview as representative of Dahlstrom's work or <br /> others. <br /> John Hassler, of Dahlstrom Development, maintained that there would be a variety of different <br /> scenarios within the development, and not strictly one color palette or style to choose from. <br /> Page 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.