Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Wednesday, September 4, 2002 <br /> 5:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Mabusth stated that is was difficult for staff and the Commission to provide some guidelines on <br /> the variance portion of the conditional used permit since they do not have any real facts. She <br /> inquired as to how this would be presented to Council next Monday night. <br /> Staff stated that the application would not be going to Council on Monday night. <br /> Mabusth noted that she thought it was rushing along. <br /> Gaffron indicated that the application would be on the agenda for September 23rd <br /> Mabusth asked if some updated information would be available for the September 16th meeting. <br /> Gaffron stated that we may have information but the applicants won't be present. <br /> Mabusth asked if any information would be known by the 16th of September. <br /> Shiff stated that they would try to address any specific areas in that time frame. He noted that <br /> because of concerns that either the Watershed District, the Planning Commission, or the City <br /> would say no, he was reluctant to spend money on engineering and planning. Shiff continued <br /> that if they have approvals then they could proceed with the engineering and whatever specific <br /> information is requested by staff, Planning Commission, and Council. <br /> Mabusth noted that there would be a reduction of hardcover in the 0-75' setback area as a result <br /> of the improvement. She asked if there would be repairs to the other trails. <br /> Gaffron stated that the plans show two cross sections for lakeside trail improvements, and on <br /> document C3.1 it does not define which areas would have a back retaining wall to hold the slope <br /> up. He noted that it would be useful to some extent to know which segments would require that <br /> type of treatment as one of the recommendations from staff was that in areas where a retaining <br /> wall is needed one of the goals has always been to screen retaining walls so they are not visible <br /> from the lake. Gaffron went on to say that it would be helpful to know which segments of trail <br /> are in areas where the shoreline is eroded up to the trail and where you might have to relocate. <br /> He continued that a better depiction would be useful and noted that Planning Commission does <br /> not have the detail along that length to know where the impacts would be the greatest. <br /> Mabusth agreed that the information would be useful, certainly before Council could make any <br /> recommendation. She asked if we would have the information by September 23rd and our <br /> engineer would have the chance to review it. <br /> Gaffron asked if that would work for the applicants. <br /> Mabusth asked the applicants if that would work. <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br />