Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, September 16, 2002 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#6) #02-2823 RONALD CLOUD, 3460 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, Continued <br /> Hawn stated that, in her opinion, the proposed conservatory would be something that would be <br /> obtrusive to the neighbors. <br /> Having visited the site, Rahn indicated that the footings that are there dictate the size of the deck. <br /> He believed that the previous deck size had been overstated and would recommend it be replaced <br /> by something similar to the original. <br /> Gaffron suggested reviewing the assessor's records to see if there was a measurement of the old <br /> deck recorded there. <br /> With regard to staff's recommendations, Chair Smith agreed that, item#3, the shed located by <br /> the lake be removed. <br /> Berg inquired as to whether the shed at the rear of the property near the driveway should be <br /> removed also. <br /> Mabusth reminded the Commission that this is the first opportunity they've been given to <br /> mandate the removal of the rear shed. <br /> If a permit cannot support its existence, Hawn suggested the shed be removed. She asked what <br /> the hardcover would be at if these things were removed. <br /> Mabusth reminded the Commission that they required a grade level deck for the Livingston <br /> application and suggested the Commission offer the applicant the opportunity to replace the shed <br /> with a lockbox. <br /> While visiting the site, Hawn indicated that one of the neighbors approached her stating that they <br /> did not wish to see any additional hardcover on the property. In fact, due to the road being paved <br /> and the excessive amounts of hardcover in the area, the neighbor asked if there was anything the <br /> City could do about the poor overlaying job and runoff <br /> Gaffron stated he believed that the original overlay may have raised the grade and he would <br /> follow-up. <br /> In conclusion, Chair Smith indicated that the deck needs to remain the same original size, the <br /> shed by the lake needs to be removed, the rear shed by the driveway removed, and due to the <br /> amount of structural coverage she felt the proposed three season porch would not fly. <br /> There were no public comments. <br /> PAGE 20 <br />