My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-16-2002 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
09-16-2002 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 3:07:45 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 3:07:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, September 16, 2002 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#9) #02-2828 TONY LUND,VACANT LOT NEXT TO 4515 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, <br /> Continued <br /> Lund questioned whether these fees would go up if they did not file for permits until 2003. <br /> Gaffron noted that these charges fluctuate with inflation and the applicant would likely save a <br /> little money by filing and paying now. <br /> Lund acknowledged that, obviously, the drainage issues would be similar to the previous <br /> applicant since this property is similar in character to the neighborhood. <br /> Mabusth questioned whether the applicant would be able to save any of the mature trees that <br /> reside on the property. <br /> Other than the ones that would need to be removed where the house would go, Lund indicated <br /> that they intend to save most of the trees. <br /> Gaffron referred to Exhibit C, which shows both parcels, and asked the Commission to examine <br /> the average lakeshore setback line that would be used to judge the two properties. Normally, one <br /> estimates the average setback based on the two adjacent homes. In this case, he suggested the <br /> Commission look at the eastern lot and consider how its placement affects the views of the house <br /> currently there. He pointed out that whichever home is built first, either the vacant lot or the <br /> existing home lot, the average lakeshore setback will be determined by the other. <br /> Lund stated that the architect and surveyor had taken this into account. <br /> In order to avoid any conflict later, Gaffron indicated that the average lakeshore setback <br /> determined by which home is built first would need to be documented up front in the resolution. <br /> He reiterated that the City does not want to be put in the situation where they've upset a <br /> neighbor, by allowing a home to be built that obstructs that neighbor's view. <br /> Rahn questioned whether the Commission can mandate no other variances be granted if they go <br /> in at different times. <br /> Gaffron pointed out that if the City has protected the lake views of the neighbor with the average <br /> lakeshore setback the applicant could tear down the existing home, build the residence at 4515, <br /> and then build on the vacant lot based on that newly defined average. <br /> Mr. Gustafson committed to tearing down the existing home and permitting the westerly house <br /> construction prior to building the easterly house. <br /> Chair Smith moved,Bremer seconded, to recommend approval of Application #02-2828, <br /> Tony Lund, Vacant Lot next to 4515 North Shore Drive, granting variance for lot area and <br /> lot width, subject to staff's recommendations, a complete site drainage plan approved by <br /> PAGE 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.