Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,August 19, 2002 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#02-2819 TIM DEVRIES, Continued) <br /> Mr. Robin maintained that, with regard to condition#6, the applicant would locate light fixtures <br /> on the east side pointing west. Although the electrical will be built, there were no definite plans <br /> for the type of fixtures proposed. <br /> Smith asked what hours the lights would be lit. <br /> Mr. Robin stated that he assumed they would be lit during the early evening hours in winter, <br /> when it gets darker earlier, to allow the children time to play on the rink. He estimated the lights <br /> would be lit from 7:30 p.m. - 9:30 p.m. He indicated that the lights would not be attached to a <br /> timer,but would be required to be turned on or off manually. <br /> Smith stated that the timer idea was to ensure that the lights did not get left on. <br /> Mr. Robin indicated that the electrical supply could be attached to a timer,but he would still <br /> design the lights to only be turned on manually, and as the electrical supply was cut, the lights <br /> would assuredly be turned off. <br /> Smith asked if the applicant was amenable to working with the neighbor. <br /> Mr. Robin believed that the applicant intended to be good neighbor and allow no light sources to <br /> go beyond the property lines, however,he would want to be able to use the rink in the evenings <br /> as well. <br /> Smith reminded the applicant that the deciduous trees would offer a different lighting perspective <br /> in the winter than they do now. <br /> Smith questioned the applicant with regard to condition#5. <br /> Gaffron asked that the applicant assure the City that it would be removed. <br /> Mr. Robin stated that he would submit a revised plan showing that they have accomplished the <br /> removal of the additional fill within the 26' buffer. <br /> Smith asked Gaffron for his opinion pertaining to condition#3. <br /> Gaffron stated that he would recommend that the Commission support the position that a copy of <br /> the notification document be attached to the file to make everyone aware that they may have to <br /> deal with WCA or MCWD later. He added that this has been done on a number of subdivisions <br /> in <br /> PAGE 22 of 28 <br />