Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, August 19, 2002 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#02-2816 ORONO MONTESSORI, INC. , Continued) <br /> Mabusth moved, Smith seconded, to approve Application #02-2816, a Conditional Use <br /> Permit for Orono Montessori,Inc., 3800 West Wayzata Boulevard, for a daycare facility <br /> and school subject to the staff conditions that the applicant obtain a DHS license and limit <br /> the number of enrollees to 60 students. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> Kuruvilla clarified that he would have 60 enrollees,plus the appropriate staff. <br /> (#8) #02-2819 TIM DEVRIES, 2180 ABINGDON WAY, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br /> 8:57 p.m. - 9:45 p.m. <br /> Jim Robin, Landscape Architect representing the Applicant, was present. <br /> Gaffron explained that the applicants are requesting a conditional use permit to alter land in <br /> excess of 500 cubic yards. The applicants are constructing a tennis court on the property and a <br /> conditional use permit is required because the applicant is proposing to move 1,040 cubic yards <br /> of fill. <br /> Gaffron noted that the applicants own the property(Lot 6) and the adjacent vacant property(Lot <br /> 5). He pointed out that of the 1,040 cubic yards of fill to be moved, approximately 120 cubic <br /> yards will be trucked from the site to another location, approximately 500 cubic yards will be <br /> trucked to lot 5 and the remaining 420 cubic yards will be used as fill on lot 6 to construct the <br /> tennis courts. <br /> The tennis court will be located southeast of the residence and meets front and side yard <br /> setbacks, the 26' setback from the delineated wetland on the property, and will be 180' from <br /> Long Creek where a 100' setback is required for non-sewered property. Gaffron indicated that it <br /> appeared that the plan did reflect a slight encroachment of fill into the 26' wetland setback area <br /> at the south end of the court, and suggested that modifications be made to the plan which <br /> incorporate a low retaining wall or other method to ensure this area remains undisturbed. <br /> Gaffron acknowledged that recent WCA (Wetland Conservation Act) regulations show that areas <br /> now defined as wetlands are more extensive on the site than those protected in 1983. Since the <br /> subject property is serviced by an on-site septic system, staff reviewed the existing proposal and <br /> found that it would not directly impact the system. Furthermore, the area being used for the <br /> tennis court would likely not be suitable for a future septic site due to its proximity less than 75' <br /> to the wetland. <br /> Gaffron noted that staff did have concern with regard to the proposed "Wetland Buffer <br /> Mitigation"proposed directly downhill from the existing mound system and would recommend <br /> that another buffer mitigation site be located that would not impact the mound. <br /> PAGE 19 of 28 <br />