My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-17-2002 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
07-17-2002 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 3:06:01 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 3:06:01 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Wednesday,July 17, 2002 <br /> 5:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#2) #02-2789 DAHLSTROM DEVELOPMENT LLC, Continued <br /> Smith asked where these proposed spaces would be added. <br /> Johnston noted that residents of the lofts have two stalls of underground parking, which could be <br /> bumped up if necessary. <br /> Krall explained that everyone who enters the loft units do so by one main entrance, so the <br /> parking should be convenient to the main entrance. <br /> Hawn asked how much outdoor parking was provided for the lofts, not including on-street <br /> parking. <br /> Counting them up, Johnston indicated that in the lofts area, there were 41 spaces, including the <br /> proof-of-parking spaces. <br /> Mabusth asked how wide they viewed Kelley Parkway. <br /> Johnston stated that they had allowed for 28' driving lanes, accompanied by 8' bump-outs for <br /> parking. <br /> With regard to punchlist item#5, Smith noted that complaints would be unavoidable since the <br /> lofts are so close to the public works facility. While they could not be lost altogether, she asked <br /> if they could be moved to the north end of the property. <br /> Mabusth cautioned against this scenario since the City had promised the residents to the north <br /> that the City would avoid any such circumstance. <br /> Rahn reiterated that the loft unit entrance road is only 20' from the Public Works Facility. <br /> Mabusth stated that if proper berming was to be achieved to screen the public works facility,the <br /> City would need to cooperate in providing a shared berm, fenced and landscaped by the <br /> developer. <br /> Rahn inquired how wide the base of the berm would need to be. <br /> Johnston indicated that they would propose coming off of the public works slope, broadening it <br /> by 5', and rolling back down into the ditch. <br /> Gaffron asked for Commissioner comment with regard to this proposal. While the plan would <br /> not impact the City's operation, Gaffron stated that it would require use of City property. <br /> Smith asked if it would ever impact operation. <br /> PAGE 7 OF 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.