Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,July 15,2002 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#02-2789 DAHLSTROM DEVELOPMENT, Continued) <br /> Rahn stated that he liked the proposed water feature. <br /> Berg stated that she understood the use of the space to the north,but believed the lofts were way too <br /> dense. She could support the site for the lofts, however, felt there were too many. With regard to <br /> traffic, Berg stated that the Commission needs to decide what Kelley Parkway will look like. <br /> Bremer stated that if there are to be lofts that is where they need to be, from an economical <br /> standpoint she could see the logic. She had less issue with the density than she did with 3 stories in <br /> general. Bremer contended that since the code allows 3-6 units per acre, the Commission should <br /> have no difficulty with 6. She complimented the applicant for their efforts in reworking the design, <br /> emphasizing the need to keep the lower price point for Orono to encourage diversity in housing. <br /> Mabusth added that the waterways are attractive and do much to enhance the plan. <br /> Bremer stated that parking to her was not a big concern and she could not support more parking at <br /> the cost of greenspace. She felt less parking might cut down on the amount of extra people <br /> Johnston pointed out that without the loft units as part of the equation, the project is at a 4 unit per <br /> acre figure. He maintained that if the City was not going to develop this property at 6 units per acre, <br /> they should not have said 3-6 units per acre in the code. With this being said, Johnston stated that <br /> the applicant would like to find a solution that is good for everyone. He added that the loft units are <br /> 60' from the property line,well within what the ordinance requires. In fact,he stated that if the City <br /> had concerns about locating housing near public works,they should have turned the building so that <br /> the ugly side faced the City Hall. With regard to a 3-story loft unit building versus a 2-story loft <br /> building, Johnston pointed out that either requires an elevator. <br /> Krall added that 3-story loft buildings were proposed because elevators will be added,and are costly. <br /> After examining the area, Krall stated that neither of the proposed 3-story loft buildings will be as <br /> high as the new senior building being built down the way. She added that the applicant does not <br /> want something obtrusive either, in fact, since they are mixing style, they propose the steps up in <br /> scale are very gradual. They have proposed continuity in their design, and have deliberately stuck <br /> to virtually the same widths throughout. Krall maintained that the lofts give people options and <br /> answer a genuine need in Orono in keeping with a high amenity design. <br /> Rahn asked why the townhomes start 1/2 story off the ground. <br /> PAGE 23 of 36 <br />