My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-17-2002 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
06-17-2002 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 2:33:00 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 2:33:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,June 17,2002 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#02-2793 REVIS STEPHENSON III,Continued) <br /> conclusion,Mr. Stephenson argued that more damage would be incurred by the wetland if the City <br /> required him to change the new buffer zone that had been created. The new buffer zone has cleaned out <br /> much of the buckthorn and other undesirables and been replaced with native grasses and trees. <br /> Mr. Stephenson added that the seeding he had done was necessary in order to avoid erosion problems <br /> during April and May rain showers. <br /> Smith asked Mr. Stephenson to help her understand how all of these errors evolved. She questioned <br /> whether he was there giving the crew direction or if someone else was the general contractor. <br /> Mr. Stephenson replied that at the outset,there had not been the wetland delineation that came later,nor <br /> did he feel the crew listened to his direction. He maintained that they had a copy of the plan in their <br /> possession but just did not listen to his requests for silt fence installation and fill limits. <br /> Smith stated that the project was under his direction and he should have managed it as such. <br /> Bellows pointed out that in any construction project, if the silt fencing is not up,they don't dump. She <br /> maintained that the City was very clear from the start that they were not pleased. She stated that it was <br /> obvious to her that the applicant thought he would get away with it, and even went so far as to plant trees. <br /> More than simply erosion control was done. She felt the applicant was not being totally upfront with the <br /> Commission,the area was once a densely treed spot, and now the applicant had created a grade almost as <br /> steep as before with no trees on the slope. <br /> Dave Peltin, 1950 Fox Ridge Road, a current eleven year resident and childhood resident,believed the <br /> project to be a vast improvement. Mr. Peltin stated that the drop off created a scary scenario, even as a <br /> child himself there years ago. He disagreed that the removal of the old vegetation created a more <br /> dangerous situation, stating that previously the only thing to catch one from falling off the cliff were <br /> stumps. He felt the newly created buffer was 100 times more valuable than what was there before. <br /> Eric Galatz, of Leonard, Street, and Deinard, was in attendance representing Richard Chalfen of 350 <br /> Brown Road South. In addition to information provided to staff and the comments by Commissioner <br /> Bellows,Mr. Galatz asked to add a few remarks.He reminded the Commission that since no hardship <br /> previously existed,Mr. Stephenson had only created a hardship for himself at this time. On Jan. 4, 2002 <br /> Mr. Stephenson was notified by MCWD to install double silt fencing. On February 22, 2002 the City of <br /> Orono asked Mr. Stephenson to stop work on the project until conditions improved, furthermore,Mr. <br /> Stephenson was responsible for obtaining a wetland delineation prior to commencing his work as <br /> required by the original permit. Through their unauthorized grading and filling project,Mr. Galatz <br /> pointed out that the Stephenson's have added nearly 40 feet to their back lawn area, as well as,built a <br /> new deck and driveway. Mr. Galatz maintained that these facts disclose the Stephensons' failure to <br /> follow terms and conditions of existing permits and prior stop work orders. <br /> Mr. Galatz continued,that his client Mr. Chalfen, greatly appreciated his natural setting and privacy, <br /> which have now been significantly impacted. He stated that the City had granted variances that would <br /> have preserved that natural setting there originally, only now that has been compromised. Mr. Galatz <br /> PAGE 12 OF 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.