Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Monday,March 18,2002 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#02-2752 Jerry and Cindy Gray, Continued) <br /> Mabusth noted she did not give any direction on the hardcover,but suggested the hardcover be reduced <br /> to the 38.8 percent. <br /> (#8) #02-2757 TERRANCE C.JOHNSON, 1045 LINDEN LANE,RENEWAL VARIANCE, <br /> 7:26 p.m.—7:52 p.m. <br /> Terrance Johnson,Applicant, was present. <br /> The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br /> Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting a renewal of variances approved in 1992. The original <br /> approvals were to permit additions to the existing residence and adding three to four courses of block <br /> under the existing house to raise the ceiling height of the walkout level of the house. The addition to the <br /> residence also included an addition of a second story over the house,the addition of an attached garage <br /> and second story rec room, addition to the east side of the existing house,replacement of existing decks, <br /> addition of a deck adjacent to the rec room and master suite, and construction of an open porch/portico <br /> over existing deck on the lakeside, and extend the existing deck along the house ten feet. In order to <br /> reduce hardcover on the property,the Applicant is agreeable to removing the existing detached garage <br /> and gravel parking area. <br /> Weinberger stated the property owner did not renew the variances on a yearly basis, stating that it was <br /> his understanding from the City that the renewal would not be necessary until they were ready to <br /> complete the project. <br /> Weinberger stated the primary issues in 1992,were potential drainage problems that may occur due to <br /> the increased hardcover in the 75-250' setback. Since 1992, the house on the adjacent lot has been <br /> removed and is currently vacant,being owned in common with another lot further down Linden Lane. <br /> Secondly, the increased length and steepness of the driveway could create some runoff and access <br /> problems for the property. The plan depicts a driveway that would average a 12 percent slope. Staff <br /> generally recommends a driveway slope of 10 percent or less. <br /> Weinberger noted the Planning Commission back in 1992, voted 4 to 3 to approve this application,with <br /> the primary concerns being the length and slope of the driveway, drainage concerns, and the amount of <br /> hardcover being proposed. The resolution adopted by the Council included language that allows the <br /> City Engineer to monitor the drainage situation on the property. <br /> Weinberger stated the Planning Commission can approve the renewal of the variances if it finds that <br /> sufficient justification exists to recommend approval of this site plan. Weinberger stated the same <br /> hardships exist today as they did back in 1992. <br /> Weinberger indicated the Applicant is proposing to do this project in stages,with the first phase of the <br /> project being to lifting the house and adding three to four course of block, followed by building the <br /> addition to the house. <br /> Johnson noted the house on the adjacent lot was gone at the time they purchased the house. Johnson <br /> PAGE 8 <br />