My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-18-2002 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
03-18-2002 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 2:29:44 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 2:29:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Monday,March 18,2002 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#5) #02-2745 ILONA AND KENNETH PETERSON, 1074 WILDHURST TRAIL, <br /> VARIANCES <br /> Ken Peterson,Applicant,and Jack Carter, Contractor,were present. <br /> Weinberger stated the Applicants are requesting variances to permit construction of a new house and <br /> detached garage on the property. The variance is to permit land alteration and construction of the <br /> garage on the property. The Planning Commission had reviewed this item at their February 19th <br /> meeting and determined the garage should be shifted out of the wetland area,noting the preferred option <br /> would be to have the garage located within the front yard setback rather than encroach into the wetland. <br /> Weinberger stated the garage is a two level structure,with the ground needing to be raised to provide <br /> driveway access to serve the two garage stalls. Weinberger stated the idea for the two-stall garage is to <br /> provide additional storage on the property as well as inside parking for two vehicles. Weinberger <br /> indicated the majority of the property is located within the wetland buffer. <br /> The Applicants have submitted a revised plan with the garage being shifted closer to the street and <br /> now located completely out of the wetland area. The proposed grade changes for the garage are also <br /> outside the wetland area. A variance is required to allow the garage to encroach into the front setback. <br /> Weinberger indicated the City Engineer has agreed to a 10-foot setback rather than a 15-foot setback <br /> from the south property line. Weinberger stated a minimal amount of grading would be needed to the <br /> front of the proposed residence,with the revised plan moving the house and decks outside the <br /> 26-foot buffer area. <br /> Weinberger stated the final issue discussed at the previous Planning Commission meeting dealt with the <br /> dual access proposed to the site. The Applicants are now proposing to relocate the access further to the <br /> north, which provides driveway access to both the lower and upper levels of the garage. The Public <br /> Works Director has reviewed the plan and is agreeable to the proposed access. <br /> Staff recommends approval of the application based on the hardships noted subject to the six conditions <br /> outlined in Staff's Report. Weinberger noted there are different methods for determining wetland <br /> boundaries today than when the property was originally platted back in 1991,which has resulted in a <br /> larger wetland than originally believed. Weinberger stated the property consists of almost two acres if <br /> the wetlands are included,with the buildable area being approximately one acre. Weinberger noted the <br /> Watershed District has issued a permit for this application,with the Applicant mitigating and creating <br /> new wetland areas consisting of approximately 2,100 square feet. Weinberger noted the actual wetland <br /> would not be impacted by this proposal,with some impact to the 26' buffer area. <br /> Peterson stated they have attempted to address all the issues that were raised at the previous Planning <br /> Commission meeting. <br /> Hawn stated in her opinion the Applicants have addressed the Planning Commission's concerns. <br /> Rahn inquired if the Applicants are still required to do mitigation of wetlands since they will only be <br /> impacting the buffer area. <br /> Weinberger stated there is no mitigation requirement if it does not actually impact the wetland,but <br /> noted that was a condition of approval required by the Watershed District. Weinberger stated the <br /> PAGE 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.