My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-18-2002 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
03-18-2002 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 2:29:44 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 2:29:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Monday,March 18,2002 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#02-2758 Robert Pieper,Continued) <br /> Vogstrom stated they were informed of the need for the permit at the time the building official inspected <br /> the project prior to issuing a final occupancy permit. <br /> There were no public comments relating to this application. <br /> Smith inquired whether the apartment as it exists today meets the regulations for an apartment inside a <br /> principal residence. <br /> Weinberger stated it does. <br /> Smith inquired what happens if a lock goes on that door leading to the apartment from inside the <br /> residence. <br /> Weinberger stated a second address will not be allowed for the unit and separate meters would also be <br /> prohibited. <br /> Hawn inquired how many access points there are to the apartment. <br /> Vogstrom stated there are two access points,with no access off the deck. <br /> Mabusth inquired whether this is being treated as an after-the-fact application. <br /> Weinberger stated the building permit would be considered after-the-fact. Weinberger stated the <br /> conditional use permit should probably be considered as after-the-fact as well. Weinberger stated the <br /> biggest concern with this type of apartment is whether they will be rented out in the future. <br /> Mabusth stated once a kitchen is added, it is then considered an apartment. <br /> Gaffron stated the issue is whether or not the door leading from the outside is the primary access to this <br /> apartment. Gaffron stated the intent of the ordinance is to make the apartment not look like an <br /> apartment from the outside and making it difficult for the unit to be rented. Gaffron noted a covenant <br /> will be recorded on the chain of title stating the apartment is within the principal residence and is for use <br /> by occupants of the principal residence,with no rental of the apartment being permitted. Gaffron noted <br /> the Applicant has met the requirements of the ordinance. <br /> Hawn moved, Smith seconded,to recommend approval of Application#02-2758, <br /> Robert D.Pieper,3995 North Shore Drive, granting an after-the-fact conditional use permit,with <br /> the understanding there will not be a lock installed on the door inside the residence leading to this <br /> apartment, and further with the understanding that a restrictive covenant will be recorded on the <br /> chain of title stating the apartment is within the principal residence and is for use by occupants of <br /> the principal residence,including their domestic employees or non-paying guests,with no rental <br /> of the guest apartment being permitted, and subject to the builder paying after-the-fact penalties. <br /> VOTE: Ayes 7,Nays 0. <br /> PAGE 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.