Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MONDAY,OCTOBER 15,2001 <br /> (#01-2724 MICHELLE AND DAVID TIMP,CONTINUED) <br /> before it reaches the property line. Oberg stated the natural grade of the land flows to the west,which <br /> will not be changed with construction of the wall. <br /> Gaffron stated the topography of the site shows the new grading directs the water runoff to the west <br /> rather than straight down the lot,which should improve the situation. Gaffron noted there are two <br /> areas where there will be some very minor grading within 75 feet of the lake to taper the land into the <br /> wall at the very east and west ends. Gaffron inquired whether those cuts could be avoided, noting <br /> they would technically require a variance. <br /> Oberg stated the face of the wall lies behind the 75-foot setback area, so the cut would be located <br /> behind the 75-foot setback as well. <br /> Gaffron requested the grades within the 0-75' setback area not be changed. <br /> Oberg stated they put the stairway straight down to avoid any grading within that area. <br /> Gaffron inquired if any steps have been taken to insure the global stability of the walls. <br /> Hawn requested global stability be defined. <br /> Oberg stated the walls are designed to support the amount of fill that is placed behind it. Oberg stated <br /> the global stability comes into play if the whole slope would fall away from the house and down the <br /> hill, similar to a mudslide. Oberg stated he was unaware of that recommendation until today, but <br /> would be agreeable to having an engineer look at that aspect of the wall. Oberg noted the land is <br /> virgin slope, with the chances of that slope being unstable relatively slim. <br /> Hawn inquired whether there were any further public comments relating to this application. <br /> There were no further public comments. <br /> Mabusth inquired whether the drainage behind the wall has been addressed. <br /> Oberg stated the wall has been designed with drain tile located behind it. Oberg stated the wall <br /> consists of three-foot boulders with one foot of aggregate behind it. Within the aggregate is four-inch <br /> drain tile with outlets every 40 feet out the face of the wall to handle the water runoff. Oberg stated <br /> the only water that would run west would be surface water that would run across the top of the wall. <br /> Mabusth inquired whether a two-tier type wall had been considered for this area. <br /> Oberg noted there is only 12 feet from the house to the 75-foot setback,which does not allow <br /> sufficient room for a two-tiered wall. <br /> Stoddard noted the City generally likes to see some type of plantings to help screen the walls, and <br /> inquired whether any type of creeping vine was considered. <br /> Oberg stated due to the design of the wall,with the one foot of aggregate behind it,there is no soil for <br /> the vines to grow. <br /> PAGE 19 <br />