My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-20-2001 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
08-20-2001 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 2:23:16 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 2:23:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
•* MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> August 20,2001 <br /> ROLL <br /> The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: <br /> Chair Elizabeth Hawn, Commissioners Daniel Kluth,Janice Berg, Jeanne Mabusth, Sandra Smith, <br /> Dale Lindquist,and Alternate Gary Welsh. Commissioner William Stoddard was absent. The <br /> following represented City Staff: Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, Zoning Administrator Wendy <br /> Bottenberg,Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, and Recorder Jackie Young. City Council <br /> Representative Jim White was present. <br /> Chair Hawn called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. <br /> CONSENT AGENDA <br /> (#1) #01-2702 FINE LINE DESIGN GROUP,3551 LIVINGSTON AVENUE,RENEWAL OF <br /> VARIANCES <br /> Hawn moved,Smith seconded,to remove Application#01-2702,Fine Line Design Group,from <br /> the Consent Agenda. VOTE: Ayes 7,Nays 0. <br /> Item#1 follows Item#4. <br /> OLD BUSINESS <br /> (#2) #01-2691 J. ERIC AND CHRISTINE MENGE,340 TURNHAM ROAD,VARIANCES, <br /> 6:31 p.m.—6:48 p.m. <br /> Craig Johnson, TC Best Homes,was present on behalf of the Applicant. <br /> Bottenberg stated this application was tabled at the July 16,2001 Planning Commission meeting to <br /> allow the Applicants time to revise their proposed plan regarding a garage and family room addition. <br /> The Applicants have redesigned their plan and have relocated the garage 24 feet from the side lot line <br /> and 53.7 feet from the front lot line. The Planning Commission had directed the Applicants that the side <br /> setback should be not less than 30 feet. The family room addition to the rear of the residence remains <br /> the same. <br /> Bottenberg indicated a variance to the side yard setback is required to allow the garage to be located <br /> 24 feet from the side lot line where 50 feet is required,and a family room addition to be located 49.8 <br /> feet from the side lot line where 50 feet is required. A variance to the front yard setback is also required <br /> to allow the garage to be located 53.7 feet from the street lot line where 100 feet is required. <br /> Johnson stated they have rotated the garage square with the house,which has resulted in the garage to <br /> be located 24 feet off the property line rather than 12 feet. Johnson stated it was his understanding from <br /> the previous Planning Commission meeting that the garage could be located between 25 and 30 feet off <br /> the side property line. Johnson stated they are planning to construct a two car garage consisting of 30 <br /> feet deep and 20 feet wide. Johnson indicated they are unable to make the garage any narrower and still <br /> accommodate two cars. <br /> PAGE 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.