Laserfiche WebLink
� 1 " <br /> // O ` <br /> � � <br /> �O O ,, <br /> �b - , � ;� CITY of ORONO <br /> � '� ti �i <br /> \��� ��,�i RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � 9 4 / 47 <br /> �kESHOj NO. � i� <br /> �_� <br /> 3. Planning Commission recommended approval by a vote of 5 to 1 to approve the <br /> variance to permit additional hardcover in the 75-250'lakeshore setback for a 7'deck <br /> extension and addition of the walkway to connect the lakeside deck to a small deck. <br /> Planning Commission made the following findings: <br /> A. The deck addition would be 3 '/'out from the exterior wall of the house. The <br /> roof overhang eYtends approximately 3' from the house. Nearly the entire <br /> walkway would be covered with "hardcover" from the roof line. No <br /> hardcover is located below the �valkway, thus the total overhead hardcover <br /> is virtually equal to the existin� based on the walkway being located below <br /> the roof line. <br /> B. There is no deck to ground access from the existing lakeside deck, eYcept <br /> through the house. The deck is approximately 10' above ground elevation. <br /> The walkway would connect to the side entrance and provide exteri��r access <br /> and an exit for the lakeside deck. Without the exterior access to the new <br /> walkway, safety is a concern. <br /> 4. Planning Commission also recommended approval of an after-the-fact variance to <br /> permit an existing garage to remain on the property located 7' from the property line <br /> where a 10'setback is required. Planning Commission recommendation is based on <br /> the follo�ving findings of fact: � <br /> A. The lot is very narro�v at the street. <br /> B. Relocating the shed further from the property line would move it too close to <br /> the existing driveway�. <br /> C. The shed �vas located to be as far as possible from view to the adjacent <br /> property owner located at 4080 Dahl Road. The neighbor's house is located <br /> much further back on the property due to the unusual property dimensions of <br /> the two lots. If the shed were required to meet the required 10' setback, the <br /> shed would have to be moved further up the driveway and very close in <br /> proximity to the neighboring house. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />