My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-21-2001 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
05-21-2001 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 2:21:08 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 2:21:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Monday,May 21,2001 <br /> (#2636 GARY AND SUSAN CABLE, CONTINUED) <br /> Smith inquired whether the Applicants would be willing to consider the addition of those two items. <br /> Cable indicated the construction of the house is completed. Cable stated they reduced the hardcover <br /> down to what they were allowed at the time they built the house. <br /> Berg indicated the need for a sidewalk and paved access to the third stall was discussed at the <br /> November Planning Commission meeting. Berg stated in her view a sidewalk and paved access will <br /> eventually be added on this property, which will bring the total hardcover on the property over the <br /> allowable 25 percent. <br /> Kluth inquired whether the City's Ordinances require a front sidewalk and paved access to all garage <br /> stalls. <br /> Weinberger stated there presently are not Code requirements pertaining to that. <br /> Kluth noted the City did issue a building permit up to the maximum hardcover amount without <br /> allowing for a sidewalk and additional driveway to the third stall. <br /> Weinberger stated that issue had been discussed at the time the Applicants applied for the building <br /> permit, but since this site plan did meet all the requirements of the City,the building permit was <br /> issued. <br /> Gaffron stated in quite a number of instances Applicants will approach the City with site plans that are <br /> in excess of the allowable hardcover,with Staff working with the Applicants in order to reduce the <br /> amount of hardcover and structural coverage being proposed on the property. Gaffron stated Staff did <br /> question the lack of a sidewalk and lack of access to the third stall of the garage at the time they <br /> applied for the building permit. Gaffron stated the Applicants would be able to place a wood chip <br /> sidewalk to the house if they so choose. <br /> Stoddard stated it is his understanding of the November Planning Commission meeting that they were <br /> debating whether the ice house should remain. Stoddard stated since this application did not reappear <br /> before the Planning Commission, he had assumed the Applicants had taken steps to address the issue <br /> of the sidewalk and access to the garage. <br /> Cable stated at the time they appeared before the Planning Commission,the building permit had <br /> already been issued. <br /> Stoddard stated the function of the Planning Commission is to help insure that the site plans are in <br /> compliance with the City's ordinances. Stoddard stated in his view the sidewalk and access to the <br /> third stall will be added in the future. Stoddard inquired whether the Applicants would be able to <br /> reduce hardcover somehow and provide for a sidewalk to the front door. <br /> Weinberger stated currently the hardcover in the 75-250' setback is under the allowable 25 percent <br /> limit by 46 square feet without the ice house. Weinberger stated the Applicants could provide a paver <br /> stone system for a front sidewalk rather than a full sidewalk. <br /> PAGE 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.