My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-17-2001 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
01-17-2001 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 2:17:56 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 2:17:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Wednesday,January 17, 2001 <br /> (#2550 Charles Van Eeckhout, Continued) <br /> which has been resolved this past November, 2000, and access into the property. Weinberger stated <br /> the main obstacle to gaining access to this property is the fact that the property in which the proposed <br /> road would be located is owned by John Dunn and not the Applicant. The Applicant has had a <br /> driveway easement over that area for perhaps the past 40 years,which has provided access to one 20 <br /> acre site. <br /> The City Attorney has reviewed the easement document, and it is his opinion that a driveway <br /> access did not imply that a road could be constructed in the easement to service additional lots. <br /> Currently the driveway services two lots in this area. At the time a third driveway is added to this <br /> access,the road would need to be upgraded to City standards. <br /> Weinberger stated the Applicant is looking for some direction from the Planning Commission on <br /> whether they feel this is a good concept plan and should proceed forward with access negotiations <br /> with the property owner to the north. Weinberger stated this proposed plan does address many of the <br /> concerns the Planning Commission and City Council have had with the other prior proposals. <br /> Van Eeckhout indicated this is the plan of record before the City, which was approved by the City <br /> Council at its November 11`}'meeting, with the message that if Long Lake approves the access,the <br /> City of Orono would approve this plan. Van Eeckhout stated at the December 18th meeting the City <br /> Council reversed itself and voted 5 to 0 to prepare a resolution of denial due to issues relating to <br /> access off of Apple Glen Road. <br /> Van Eeckhout stated another plan he had proposed calling for seven lots was denied due to the <br /> small lot sizes, which has resulted in a number of different revisions in the plan. Van Eeckhout <br /> noted the two main issues relating to this development have primarily focused on access and <br /> the amount of wetlands on the property. <br /> Van Eeckhout stated he does have legal access off of Apple Glen Road according to the Attorney <br /> General's Office, but due to the concerns expressed by the citizens of Long Lake, he is attempting <br /> to gain access to this development off of Brown Road. Van Eeckhout noted the Long Lake Planning <br /> Commission recently tabled his application. Van Eeckhout indicated he would prefer access off of <br /> Brown Road rather than have access disputed by the citizens of Long Lake. <br /> Van Eeckhout stated in an effort to move forward, he has contacted John Dunn, who indicated he <br /> would be agreeable to submit to binding arbitration. Eeckhout indicated he has made three offers <br /> to Dunn in the past, who has returned all three offers unsigned. Eeckhout stated he has not received <br /> any offer back from Dunn regarding access. Eeckhout stated he would like to pursue binding <br /> arbitration on the issue of access. <br /> Van Eeckhout stated he is looking for guidance on whether the layout before the Planning <br /> Commission is acceptable. Van Eeckhout stated this plan is predicated on access off of Brown Road. <br /> Mabutsh inquired whether this development would be hooked up to City sewer. <br /> Van Eeckhout stated it has been recommended that this property be hooked up to City sewer due <br /> to the sensitive environment issues that exist, and that there is the capacity to be hooked up to the <br /> PAGE 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.