My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-18-2000 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
09-18-2000 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 2:13:52 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 2:13:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> SEPTEMBER 18,2000 <br /> • (#2604 Narrows Saloon, Continued) <br /> Lindquist pointed out the work on the building has already been completed and that the <br /> Applicant needs to operate his business within the law. Lindquist stated he is unsure where the <br /> additional parking would come from if the Applicant were required to provide additional parking. <br /> Kluth inquired how the work could have been commenced prior to the conditional use permit <br /> being issued. <br /> Anderst stated he applied for a liquor license, and contained within the liquor license was the <br /> additional square footage. <br /> Johnson stated the liquor license contained language notifying the City that he would be <br /> leasing 2,000 square feet, with an option to expand to 3,000 square feet, as well as a footprint <br /> for the liquor store. The Applicant also disclosed that the purchase of the building was <br /> contingent upon approval of that option. At the time the building permit was issued,the <br /> conditional use permit was not raised. <br /> Anderst stated he was not notified he needed a conditional use permit until the time the <br /> footings were inspected. Anderst stated the building inspector missed the fact that footings were <br /> being poured at the time the building permit was issued. <br /> Kluth inquired when the construction was completed. <br /> Johnson stated the Applicant appeared before the City Council in July regarding this matter, <br /> 1111 with the City Council permitting continuation of the construction at that time. <br /> Stoddard moved to recommend approval of Application#2604,Narrows Saloon, <br /> 3380 Shoreline Drive,subject to no further expansion to the business. MOTION DIED <br /> DUE TO LACK OF SECOND. <br /> Smith stated it would be her understanding the Applicant would need to come back before the <br /> Planning Commission and City Council if he wished to expand his business further, and at that <br /> point the City would act on his application. <br /> Gaffron stated the Planning Commission has wide latitude in the placing of restrictions on this <br /> business to protect the character of the neighborhood and business climate which abuts a <br /> residential neighborhood. <br /> Hawn inquired whether the size of the business could be limited. <br /> Gaffron stated the Planning Commission could restrict the size of the business as part of the <br /> conditional use permit,but that a future City Council or Planning Commission may elect to <br /> change that. <br /> Johnson stated in his opinion the Planning Commission is making its record right now by noting <br /> its concerns relating to expansion of the business. Johnson stated the Applicant will need to <br /> appear before the Planning Commission if he chooses to expand the business. <br /> • <br /> PAGE 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.