My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-17-2000 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
07-17-2000 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 2:12:30 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 2:12:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> JULY 17, 2000 <br /> • <br /> (#2599 BOB AND WENDY BEUTLER, Continued) <br /> Beutler stated he has spoken with his neighbor who indicated he does not have any major concerns <br /> regarding the proposal. Beutler indicated they have been working closely with City Staff to arrive <br /> at a plan that would be acceptable. Beuticr stated in his opinion this plan is a <br /> win/win situation, with the four-season porch allowing them to enjoy the climate year-round <br /> without the need for a deck or patio. <br /> Smith inquired whether there were any concerns that City Staff may have relating to the recently <br /> submitted grading and drainage plan. <br /> Weinberger stated City Staff at this time does not have any major concerns regarding the grading <br /> and drainage plan. Weinberger stated Staff does have a concern with the long driveway and the <br /> lack of a turnaround being provided. The Applicant has indicated there is a way to include a <br /> turnaround in this proposal. <br /> Lindquist inquired whether that would negatively impact the hardcover on this lot. <br /> Weinberger stated the hardcover was calculated based on a larger driveway that what is being <br /> proposed and should not be an issue. Weinberger stated the Applicant is aware that he needs to <br /> comply with the 25 percent hardcover limit on this application. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> • Lindquist commented his only concern with this application was the lack of a turnaround and the <br /> impact to hardcover should a turnaround be constructed. <br /> Beutler indicated he is aware of those concerns. <br /> Kluth noted the proposed residence encroaches upon the average lakeshore setback by a few feet, <br /> and inquired whether it would be possible to relocate the house out of the setback. <br /> Beuticr stated the lot has topography issues, which are solved by pushing the house back a little <br /> bit. Beutler indicated the location of the existing driveway is where the new driveway will be <br /> constructed, with the dirt then being able to be utilized to correct the drainage problems on this <br /> lot. Beuticr stated if the plan is reversed, it would create an additional drainage problem for the <br /> property on the other side. Beutler commented this is the best location for the house based on the <br /> topography of the lot. <br /> Smith inquired what impact it would have if the house were totally removed out of the average <br /> lakeshore setback. <br /> Beutler stated if the house is pushed back any further, they would lose their view of the lake and <br /> would not be taking advantage of the existing natural drainage channels. <br /> Weinberger stated the only way to eliminate the average lakeshore variance would be to remove a <br /> portion of the proposed residence. Weinberger stated the proposed drainage and grading plan lends <br /> • itself well to this property and keeps the residence consistent with the other houses in the area. <br /> PAGE 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.