Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> JULY 17, 2000 <br /> • <br /> (#2597 Dennis Krump, Continued) <br /> Stoddard moved, Kluth seconded,to recommend approval of Application #2597, <br /> Dennis Krump, 25 Stubbs Bay Road North,variances to front yard setback and side yard <br /> setback to allow the construction of an addition to the south side of the residence. <br /> VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> (#2) #2598 DOUGLAS J. DAYTON,300 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH— VARIANCES, <br /> 6:35 p.m.—6:42 p.m. <br /> Douglas Dayton, Applicant, was present. <br /> The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br /> Bottenberg stated the Applicant is proposing to construct a 12' by 16' addition onto the lakeshore <br /> side of the existing residence. The addition will be located 80' from the lakeshore. Mooney Lake is <br /> classified as a Recreational Development Lake and therefore a 100' setback is required for the <br /> structure. The Recreational Development Lake for Mooney Lake was adopted by the City in <br /> 1992. The existing residence is located 83' from the lakeshore. <br /> Bottenberg stated the Applicant is proposing to remodel a bathroom and turn the existing closet <br /> into a vanity area. The new addition will be a closet. <br /> • The residence was constructed in 1960, before current zoning standards were adopted. The <br /> residence is located on approximately 90 acres in the RR-1B zoning district where two acres <br /> is required. The property is served with a septic system and well and will not be impacted by the <br /> addition. This addition will not add to the total number of bedrooms in the residence; therefore <br /> a larger septic system is not required at this time. <br /> Bottenberg noted structural coverage is not an issue in this application, with no impact to the <br /> adjoining residences. <br /> The Applicant is requesting a variance to permit a lakeshore setback of 80' where 100' is required. <br /> City Staff recommends approval of the variance. <br /> Smith inquired where the adjoining residences are located in relation to this residence. <br /> Dayton indicated on the overhead projection where the adjoining residences were located. <br /> Dayton stated he has no additional comments regarding his application. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Nygard stated he has a minor concern related to the setback variance, noting that the City Council <br /> did vote to override the setback recommended by the Planning Commission for the applicant <br /> located on Concordia Street. Nygard inquired whether the Applicant can limit the setback to the <br /> existing 83'. <br /> PAGE 2 <br />