My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-19-2000 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
06-19-2000 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 2:11:16 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 2:11:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> JUNE 19, 2000 <br /> • <br /> (#2596 BRENSHELL HOMES,CONTINUED) <br /> Weinberger stated the six proposed lots would average approximately one acre in site,with all <br /> lots being connected to sewer and served with private wells. Sewer is currently available in <br /> Wildhurst Trail and would need to be extended between Lots 2 and 3 to the new road. <br /> Weinberger indicated Lots 2 and 3, located at the end of the cul-de-sac, do not have the required <br /> lot width for new lots in this zoning district and would require variances for lot width. Lot 5 does not <br /> have the required frontage along the proposed road and would require a variance as the <br /> width of the lot is narrower adjacent to Outlot A than Garden Lane. Garden Lane would only be <br /> developed to the intersection with Outlot A and would become a public road. <br /> Weinberger stated Lot 1 is proposed at 1.03 acres, but does not account for land area dedicated <br /> for the NURP pond,with the City not crediting buildable area for land that will be used as a <br /> drainageway or for storage of stormwater. Weinberger noted a variance would be required for <br /> lot area. <br /> Weinberger stated Lots 2 and 3 would require lot width variances since they are less than the <br /> 140 feet required width at the rear of the front yard setback. Both lots are considered to be <br /> through lots since they would have access to the new road and are adjacent to Wildhurt Trail. <br /> Weinberger stated Lot 4 would be a conforming lot and does have a buildable area that would be <br /> • suitable for residential construction. Lot 5 would have approximately 90 feet of frontage along <br /> the front property line, with no direct access being available from Garden Lane. <br /> Weinberger stated Lot 6 contains a major ravine, which is shown on the preliminary drawings <br /> as a drainage easement. City Code requires properties served by municipal sanitary sewer,the <br /> minimum lot area may be divided by Flood Fringe lands provided at least one half acre of land not <br /> within the protected area is included in one contiguous parcel and both municipal sewer and legal <br /> access is available to that building site without encroachment on the protected area.. According <br /> to the proposed plan,the driveway access would impact the southern edge of the ravine. Weinberger <br /> noted the City Engineer is reviewing this driveway location for Lot 6,with on-site grading and <br /> drainage plans needing to be submitted to the MCWD for review. Weinberger stated access to <br /> Lot 6 is not possible without impacting the ravine. <br /> Weinberger stated athe road and most of the lots will drain towards the NURP pond depicted on <br /> Lot 1, with the pond draining to the ravine along the south lot line of Lot 2. Staff has a concern <br /> about the drainage being diverted into one location before it drains to the east side of Wildhurst <br /> Trail, with the City Engineer recommending that all drainage be diverted to the north from the <br /> pond and into the ravine located in Lot 6, with some form of water retention downstream before <br /> it enters Lake Minnetonka. Weinberger stated additional information regarding the drainage will <br /> need to be submitted to the City Engineer for his review and approval. <br /> Weinberger stated the Park Commission will need to review this application as it relates to the <br /> issue of park dedication. This property is located across an undeveloped road from the Saga Hill <br /> Park and provides the City of Orono with an opportunity to determine if a land dedication would <br /> be appropriate to protect the ravine. <br /> • <br /> PAGE 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.