Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> JUNE 19, 2000 <br /> • <br /> (#2589 WOODHILL COUNTRY CLUB, CONTINUED) <br /> with the neighbors and try to resolve these issues and to discuss whether additional conditions are <br /> necessary. <br /> Jackson stated the Club would like to do these improvements prior to wintertime. <br /> Smith noted this application will go before the City Council as a failed motion. <br /> Hawn recommended the parties meet prior to this application appearing before the City Council to <br /> try to resolve these issues. <br /> Smith stated in her view by allowing this application to go before the City Council as a failed motion, <br /> the Planning Commission has not completed their job. <br /> Lindquist stated in his opinion the unresolved issues that have existed for over a year need to be <br /> resolved prior to this application proceeding on to the City Council. <br /> (#4) #2592 MIKE HILBELINK AND JOHN VOGT,350 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH— <br /> PROPOSED TWO LOT SUBDIVISION,8:25 p.m.—8:49 p.m. <br /> • Mike Hilbelink and John Vogt,Applicants, were present. <br /> The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br /> Weinberger stated the Applicants are proposing a lot split of an existing parcel located at 350 Stubbs <br /> Bay Road North. This property is located within the RR-1B zoning district, with a two acre minimum. <br /> this site is located on the east side of Stubbs Bay Road, with the land to the west of Stubbs Bay <br /> road being located in the five acre minimum lot size district. <br /> The Applicants are proposing a front/back lot subdivision which requires greater zoning standards <br /> for properties that do not have immediate road access. Lot 2 would not have direct access to a road. <br /> This property does have adequate land area to make this subdivision work, with both lots having <br /> acreage that exceeds the required minimum standards. Weinberger stated one lot would consist of <br /> approximately four acres, with the other lot consisting of approximately 10 acres. Weinberger stated <br /> three acres are required for a lot that does not have direct access to a road. <br /> Weinberger stated Lot 1 will be approximately 2.73 acres dry buildable, with the wetlands not <br /> impacting upon the proposed building pads for either lot. The main issue with this application is the <br /> access to the two properties,with front/back subdivisions requiring that an outlot be created as an <br /> access outlot for a private driveway. Weinberger stated in this case there is an existing driveway, <br /> with the outlot being configured in such a way as to allow access to the back lot. This arrangement <br /> would require a shared driveway access. <br /> Weinberger stated it would be appropriate to increase the width of the outlot an additional 10 feet <br /> to the south to accommodate drainage, snow removal and screening from the building site on <br /> • Lot 1. The submitted site plan indicates the outlot's southern boundary follows the existing driveway. <br /> PAGE 15 <br />