My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-15-2000 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
05-15-2000 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 2:09:35 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 2:09:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Monday, May 15, 2000 <br /> • <br /> (#2578 David Lundberg, Continued) <br /> opportunity to review the plans for the proposed improvement and understand this letter is not <br /> requesting them to approve or disapprove this project but merely to confirm to the Planning <br /> Commission and City Council that we are aware of the plans for this project. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Smith commented that the Planning Commission cannot conclude that the neighbors are in support <br /> of this project but are merely acknowledging that they are aware of the proposed project. <br /> Lundberg stated he has spoken with his neighbors regarding this project. <br /> Lindquist stated he would like a letter in support of this project before the application appears before <br /> the City Council. <br /> Lindquist moved, Berg seconded,to recommend approval of Application #2578, <br /> 900 Dakota Avenue, granting of a side yard setback to permit the construction of a 26 by 26 <br /> foot two story garage addition to the existing residence, subject to the submittal of a letter <br /> in support of the project by Tim and Julie Harrison. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> (#5) #2579 JAMES AND CANDANCE KEMNA, 1110 WILLOW DRIVE SOUTH -VARIANCES, <br /> 6:53 p.m. -7:10 p.m. <br /> James Kemna, Applicant, was present. <br /> The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br /> Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting variances to permit an addition to the front of the <br /> house and outdoor porch that would encroach further into the 50 foot front yard setback and into the <br /> 30 foot side yard setback and variances to permit an addition to the detached garage that <br /> encroaches into the 15 foot side yard setback required for accessory structures of 750 to 1000 <br /> square feet. Weinberger indicated the lot consists of approximately one-half acre in the RR-1 B <br /> zoning district, which has a minimum two acre lot size. <br /> Weinberger stated the addition to the front of the residence would bring the front of the residence <br /> approximately 22 feet from the roadway. The entire addition and existing house is within the <br /> 50 foot front yard setback and the 35 foot side yard setback. The additional 240 square feet that <br /> is proposed would change the footprint of the building to over 750 square feet, which requires that <br /> the building must meet the minimum setback to the property line of 15 feet. <br /> The variances being requested would permit a front yard setback of 23 feet where 41.1 feet exists <br /> and 50 feet is required, and also to permit the addition within the 30 foot side yard setback. The <br /> existing house is 8.2 feet from the west lot line. No encroachment closer than 8 feet is proposed. <br /> The second variance is to the side yard setback to permit a building over 750 feet. Code requires <br /> a 15 foot setback for buildings over 750 square feet. The 24 by 10 foot addition would expand the <br /> building to 816 square feet, thus requiring a 15 foot setback. The third variance required would be <br /> to permit the building to be located closer to Willow Drive than the average distance of the properties <br /> located around it. The intent of the ordinance is to keep the buildings in a conforming look within the <br /> neighborhood and not block the view of the adjoining residences by having a residence located <br /> • closer to the street. Weinberger noted the lots in this area are smaller in size and generally do not <br /> meet the front yard setback. This encroachment into the front yard setback would result in a <br /> Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.