My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-25-2011 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2011
>
04-25-2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 11:22:40 AM
Creation date
2/24/2012 10:11:24 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
347
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 11, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 21 of 30 <br /> <br />(8. OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PLAN AND SPECIFICATION <br />APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE, Continued) <br /> <br />Franchot moved, Bremer seconded, to approve the plans submitted by the City Engineer containing <br />the various options requested by the Council and to direct that those plans and specifications be put <br />out for bid, with the bids being received by May 19th, and with the final bid numbers being <br />presented to the Council on May 23rd. <br /> <br />Rahn commented he does not see any benefit to not put this project out to bid. Rahn noted the Council is <br />not here tonight to decide whether the project moves forward but to approve putting it out for bids. If in <br />fact the project does not move forward for whatever reason, the Council will need to have more <br />discussion than simply making a motion on how to proceed. Rahn reiterated at this point he does not see <br />any benefit to the City by not putting the project out for bid since it would involve minimal costs to the <br />City. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if there will be any work required by the City Engineer in May. <br /> <br />Kellogg stated the only work planned at the present time is relocating the utilities so they are out of the <br />way for when the project starts. Kellogg indicated his office will also need to respond to some of the <br />state’s questions. <br /> <br />McMillan stated if the landscaping, irrigation, and trees and shrubs were removed for cost reasons, that <br />she would not expect the school board to have any interest in maintaining the median and that she has a <br />concern that it will become an eyesore if it is merely grass. McMillan stated in thinking about the <br />landscaping, if all the landscaping is left out, it will leave a flawed design, and that is one of the issues she <br />has with proceeding forward with going out for bids. <br /> <br />Bremer requested the mayor call the question. <br /> <br />Printup stated as it relates to the comments from the open house, it was said that it's a great idea, but then <br />it goes on to say, way too much traffic for the road the way it is now. Other comments were that the <br />design does not greatly improve the elementary drop off; make sure the entrance to the middle school lot <br />is available; traffic flow as it is currently set up does not work very well; plans address both safety <br />concerns and traffic flow problems; current traffic congestion and flow is abysmal and concerning; it's <br />scary to leave the parking lot from the school. <br /> <br />Printup commented that it may not necessarily be a problem with the road itself but it could be a problem <br />with the school bus drop-off and pickup design. Printup noted in the past he has asked why the school is <br />so interested in this project, is the City alleviating a problem for them and why do they want this project. <br />Printup stated it goes back to the discussion that the Council had months ago when he asked what skin in <br />the game the school has. <br /> <br />Printup stated even with the new design the stacking will likely continue. The drop-off times might go <br />from 45 minutes to 40 minutes. There might also be a few accidents during the learning process of the <br />roundabouts. <br /> <br />McMillan commented there could also be some new stacking problems with the roundabouts. <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 04/25/2011 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 04/11/2011 <br />[Page 21 of 30]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.