My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-11-2011 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2011
>
04-11-2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 11:22:06 AM
Creation date
2/24/2012 10:11:08 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
221
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 28, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> Page 19 of 24 <br /> <br />(8. CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SPEED BUMPS, Continued) <br /> <br />McMillan stated the City will need to figure out a process where to locate them to best suit the residents <br />who want them. <br /> <br />O’Reilly noted there is a curve as you come down the hill and that maybe it should be moved down a <br />little bit further, which would solve the noise problem for 3295 Crystal Bay Road. <br /> <br />Tom Jensen, 3325 Crystal Bay Road, indicated he also does not want the speed bumps close to his <br />property. The reality is, when you are coming down by 3309 Crystal Bay Road, there is a huge bank and <br />there is an incline. The property at 3309 Crystal Bay Road is elevated above the road and would be a <br />perfect spot for the hump. Jensen noted there is a huge transformer and power pole near his property. <br />Jensen stated the City has to have a process for the residents to be heard on this. <br /> <br />Schmid commented that he does not know if people realize how loud they are and how much light the <br />headlights on cars cast. Schmid stated the residents have to decide what is really important, the speed or <br />being disturbed at night. <br /> <br />Zagaria requested the hump be removed or relocated away from his property. <br /> <br />McMillan stated hopefully the City can develop a process to decide the appropriate locations and that <br />perhaps the neighbors can arrive at some desirable locations. <br /> <br />O’Reilly stated it looks like there are enough votes on the Council to get the temporary humps. <br /> <br />Bremer stated without knowing the exact location, it is difficult to approve the speed humps. <br /> <br />Printup asked when they could be installed if it is approved tonight. <br /> <br />DeBaere stated as far as the Public Works Department is concerned, they could be installed by the time <br />the frost is out provided they are ordered and delivered by that time. <br /> <br />Franchot asked how they would be paid for. <br /> <br />Printup commented with the removal of a few trees on the Old Crystal Bay Road project, that money <br />could be reallocated. <br /> <br />Bremer stated unfortunately that is not the reality and that the money for the Old Crystal Bay Road <br />project is coming from a different fund. <br /> <br />Franchot asked how the residents would feel about chipping in if the right locations are determined. <br /> <br />Bremer stated each of the neighbors would have to be asked. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she would agree with three to four speed humps at city expense. <br /> <br />Franchot indicated he would also be in agreement with speed humps. Franchot stated it would need to be <br />recognized that this is experimental. <br /> <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 04/11/2011 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 03/28/2011 <br />[Page 19 of 24]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.