My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-28-2011 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
03-28-2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 11:21:41 AM
Creation date
2/24/2012 10:10:45 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
356
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 14, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 4 of 22 <br /> <br />(LMCD REPORT, Continued) <br /> <br />McMillan asked whether any additional bays are being considered for chemical treatment. <br /> <br />McDermott indicated the DNR has given approval to do treatment on a couple of additional bays but that <br />the LMCD will not be financially contributing to that chemical treatment and will only be contributing to <br />the three bays that were treated last year. <br /> <br />Rahn asked if the elevation of the Old Grays Bay dam is 931.5 or 930.5. <br /> <br />McDermott indicated he is unsure of the exact elevation but that the excess water would go over into the <br />spillway. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated his understanding is they are talking about 930.2 as being the potential elevation this <br />spring. The highest level ever experienced is 930.5. Gaffron noted some water was let out late last fall in <br />anticipation of possible flooding this spring and that he is not sure what the elevation of the spillway is at <br />this point but that it likely is not 930.5. <br /> <br />McDermott commented they attempt to avoid heavy flooding and that it is difficult to anticipate in the fall <br />whether flooding will occur in the spring. <br /> <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - DENISE LESKINEN, REPRESENTATIVE <br /> <br />Leskinen stated she had nothing to report but would be available for questions. <br /> <br /> <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> <br />Michael LaQuay, P.O. Box 94, Crystal Bay, indicated he has a question on what the City’s policy is on <br />the proposal by Three Rivers for parking in the Crystal Bay area. LaQuay proposed that the City consider <br />adopting a policy to allow no additional parking in that area. In addition, LaQuay indicated he was <br />wondering if the City has considered a previous proposal he presented of allowing parking on Railroad <br />Avenue to be extended south on both the east and west sides. It is currently designated as resident only <br />parking. Part of that proposal was to have a speed limit sign posted at 15 miles per hour along Railroad <br />Avenue. <br /> <br />LaQuay indicated he had also previously asked why Railroad Avenue is considered a city road when it <br />does not meet city standards, which was not fully explained. LaQuay indicated Railroad Avenue is <br />substandard and should not be considered a city road. <br /> <br />McMillan commented that 60 feet is a standard right-of-way but that the paved part of the road is not <br />always built to that width. <br /> <br />LaQuay indicated the right-of-way is 40 feet. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated he has been meeting with representatives of Three Rivers Park District over the winter <br />and that they are ready to come back before the City Council to discuss this issue. Three Rivers and <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 03/28/2011 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 03/14/2011[Page 4 of 22]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.