Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 14, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 10 of 22 <br /> <br />(9. MASSAGE THERAPY LICENSE REQUIREMENTS, Continued) <br /> <br />of organizations that cannot do background checks. The City Attorney has indicated the City does have <br />the ability under their licensing regulations to conduct background checks. <br /> <br />Mattick stated background checks are common for massage centers, but that Staff could conduct a survey <br />of the surrounding communities to see whether they perform background checks if the Council wishes. <br />Mattick noted not every community requires a background check for employees of massage centers and <br />that they could draft up some preliminary language. <br /> <br />Bremer stated she does not see anything wrong with background checks since it increases public safety <br />but that she does want to avoid a situation where the City is over-regulating. Bremer commented that it <br />might be best to do a survey of the surrounding communities to see what their practice is. Part of the <br />licensing process is that the customer receives some assurance the person meets certain standards. <br /> <br />McMillan concurred the licensing process gives some assurance to the customer and that her initial <br />concern with the ordinance was licensing individual massage therapists and how that might be too <br />onerous. McMillan indicated in her view massage centers should be licensed. <br /> <br />Mattick noted similar to tobacco or liquor licenses, the City has the ability to conduct compliance checks <br />regardless if a background check is required. <br /> <br />Bremer commented that it may not be necessary to ask the surrounding communities as long as the City <br />Attorney knows there are some other cities that require background checks. <br /> <br />Mattick indicated he is not sure of specific cities. Mattick pointed out that a background check does not <br />guarantee that something will not happen but that it is one additional step that can be taken. The City is <br />only conducting a background check on the employer currently, which may be enough, and that it comes <br />down to whether the City feels it needs the additional background checks on the employees. <br /> <br />Police Chief Farniok stated it was a concern that was raised recently that if the City is going to license <br />massage centers, whether the City has an obligation to conduct background checks of people who will be <br />actually performing the massages. Farniok indicated the background checks of employees would be one <br />additional measure of safety. <br /> <br />Curtis asked if this is a business that can do background checks of their employees. <br /> <br />Bremer indicated she does not have that information available at the meeting, but that typically employers <br />who deal with mental health issues, schools, or counselors are required to run background checks of their <br />employees. School bus companies are not required to run background checks. Depending on the type of <br />business, some companies can go back ten years, some can go back seven years, and some can consider <br />DWIs. Bremer indicated the private sector undergoes a different type of analysis depending on the type <br />of employment. <br /> <br />Bremer stated in this instance the City is attempting to prevent someone convicted of a sexual assault or <br />sexual crime from being a massage therapist. The question becomes whether or not the private employer <br />will conduct a criminal background check. While many employers are aware of the opportunity to do <br />that, they may not always take advantage of it since there is an additional charge that they would incur. <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 03/28/2011 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 03/14/2011[Page 10 of 22]