Laserfiche WebLink
153661v1 59 <br />with a height not to exceed 75 feet. <br /> <br />3. Co-located on a new city emergency warning siren tower, at a <br />location that meets the city's emergency warning needs, with a <br />height not to exceed 75 feet. <br /> <br />d. Such antennas shall meet the following performance standards: <br /> <br />1. The antennas must be located on the existing emergency warning <br />sirens poles, unless the height of the existing pole, or the capacity <br />of the existing pole to support both the siren and the antenna(s) is <br />inadequate to minimally meet the needs of the carrier. In this case, <br />the carrier may be allowed to install a replacement tower that will <br />accommodate both the emergency warning siren and the <br />telecommunications antenna(s). The existing emergency siren <br />towers can be replaced with towers with a maximum height of 75 <br />feet, with the condition that the tower accommodates both the <br />emergency warning siren and the telecommunications antenna(s). <br />The city may also require the tower to have the capability of <br />accommodating one additional carrier's antenna(s). <br /> <br />2. A new emergency warning siren tower location, selected by the <br />city to meet its emergency warning needs, could also be used as a <br />telecommunications antenna site through co-location of the <br />warning siren and antenna. The standards set out in 1. above also <br />apply to a siren tower in a new location. <br /> <br />3. The height of a tower can be no higher than the minimum height <br />required to address a gap in coverage. <br /> <br />4. The setback of a tower from a property line must, at minimum, be <br />equal to the height of the tower, except where an existing <br />emergency warning siren is located on a site that does not enable <br />this setback too be provided. <br /> <br />5. A carrier must demonstrate through an engineering analysis that <br />there is a gap in coverage. <br /> <br />6. At the city's discretion, a tower must be designed to structurally <br />enable co-location by another carrier, and the carrier must agree to <br />allow co-location. <br /> <br />7. The carrier must provide computer-generated photos showing the <br />views (as selected by the city) with an without the tower. <br /> <br />8. All consultant analysis and legal analysis related to the towers and <br />Item #05 - CC Agenda - 11/22/2010 <br />File #10-3454 [Total Pages 151]