My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-22-2010 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2010
>
11-22-2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 11:38:56 AM
Creation date
2/24/2012 10:08:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
153661v1 88 <br />telecommunications antenna(s). The existing emergency siren <br />towers can be replaced with towers with a maximum height of 75 <br />feet, with the condition that the tower accommodates both the <br />emergency warning siren and the telecommunications antenna(s). <br />The city may also require the tower to have the capability of <br />accommodating one additional carrier's antenna(s). <br /> <br />2. A new emergency warning siren tower location, selected by the <br />city to meet its emergency warning needs, could also be used as a <br />telecommunications antenna site through co-location of the <br />warning siren and antenna. The standards set out in 1. above also <br />apply to a siren tower in a new location. <br /> <br />3. The height of a tower can be no higher than the minimum height <br />required to address a gap in coverage. <br /> <br />4. The setback of a tower from a property line must, at minimum, be <br />equal to the height of the tower, except where an existing <br />emergency warning siren is located on a site that does not enable <br />this setback too be provided. <br /> <br />5. A carrier must demonstrate through an engineering analysis that <br />there is a gap in coverage. <br /> <br />6. At the city's discretion, a tower must be designed to structurally <br />enable co-location by another carrier, and the carrier must agree to <br />allow co-location. <br /> <br />7. The carrier must provide computer-generated photos showing the <br />views (as selected by the city) with an without the tower. <br /> <br />8. All consultant analysis and legal analysis related to the towers and <br />the lease of the towers shall be paid by the carrier. <br /> <br />9. The carrier is required to provide coverage maps to demonstrate <br />the specific gap in coverage and need for an additional tower and <br />antenna(s), and to demonstrate there are no existing tower options <br />within a radius of two miles that could accommodate the carrier's <br />antenna needs. <br /> <br />10. The size of the cabinets on the ground needed to house the support <br />equipment for the antennas is limited to the minimum necessary <br />size, as determined by the city council. Appropriate vegetative <br />screening of ground cabinets shall be provided by the carrier, <br />subject to approval by the city council. The council at its discretion <br />may allow the use of non-vegetative screening methods such as <br />Item #05 - CC Agenda - 11/22/2010 <br />File #10-3454 [Total Pages 151]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.