My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-2010 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2010
>
11-08-2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 11:38:23 AM
Creation date
2/24/2012 10:08:36 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 25, 2010 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 7 of 17 <br /> <br />(6. #10-3483 CITY OF ORONO – ZONING AMENDMENT – COLUMBARIUM, Continued) <br /> <br />Franchot stated he is still somewhat confused about the maximum size that will be allowed for a structure <br />and that he is interested in defining in ground memorial gardens to have more flexibility but that they <br />cannot automatically allow that for all columbaria. <br /> <br />Murphy asked whether a CUP can be brought into this process. <br /> <br />White stated one option is to require a 5-foot setback for in ground memorial gardens and a 10-foot <br />setback for above ground structures. <br /> <br />Linda Feuss stated one of the reasons for the year-round screening is that there will be services involved, <br />and that out of respect for the neighbors, there should be some type of barrier. <br /> <br />White stated this will need to be determined on a case-by-case basis. <br /> <br />McMillan asked whether any additional research should be done on above ground columbaria. <br /> <br />White noted this is the third time the draft ordinance has been discussed and asked whether the City <br />Attorney has any suggestions to help speed up the process. <br /> <br />Mattick stated the draft ordinance does allow for a CUP, and if the ordinance is adopted, there would be a <br />conditional use process that the churches would need to go through. The City Council would have the <br />authority to add other controls or conditions they feel appropriate and that the ordinance contains the <br />minimum standards. <br /> <br />McMillan stated aesthetically above ground columbaria resemble a cemetery and that this is where the <br />setback and height restrictions become more important. In the case of an -above ground columbaria, <br />additional screening is more desirous. <br /> <br />White noted additional conditions could be set for each application depending on the situation through the <br />conditional use permit process. <br /> <br />McMillan commented she would like to see some additional research done by staff on above ground <br />columbaria. <br /> <br />Bremer asked whether anything can be passed tonight that would allow the Good Shepherd Church to <br />move forward with their application. <br /> <br />Murphy suggested the Council adopt Option 2, with a conditional use permit being drafted for Good <br />Shepherd. <br /> <br />Gaffron asked whether Good Shepherd has submitted an application yet. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated they have not. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted it would be approximately a 60-day process once the application is submitted. <br /> <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 11/08/2010 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 10/25/2010 [Page 7 of 17]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.