My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-25-2010 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
10-25-2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2015 10:41:18 AM
Creation date
2/24/2012 10:08:16 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 11, 2010 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 6 of 20 <br /> <br />(5. #10-3467 STEVEN SCHUSSLER AND SUNHI RYAN, 1935 CONCORDIA STREET, <br />Continued) <br /> <br />Staff finds that the applicant has a reasonable use of the property and the hardcover proposed is not <br />supported by a hardship. Further, the applicant has not demonstrated that enforcing the hardcover <br />provisions of the Zoning Ordinance deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of their property. Staff <br />recommends denial of the variance. <br /> <br />Bremer asked if it had not been for the recent Supreme Court ruling, whether Staff would have <br />recommended approval of this application. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated Staff would have recommended some level of hardcover variance. <br /> <br />Bremer stated the recent Supreme Court ruling has changed how cities can deal with variances. Bremer <br />noted the case before the Supreme Court involved a person who already had a garage and were requesting <br />permission to add a second story on to the garage. This property owner does not currently have a garage. <br /> <br />Steven Schussler indicated the previous garage was torn down by a previous owner due to its deteriorated <br />condition. The previous property owner had received approval to construct the garage but it was never <br />constructed due to financial reasons. <br /> <br />Bremer asked whether it was a detached garage that was originally approved. <br /> <br />Schussler indicated it was. Schussler indicated the house is homesteaded. Sunhi Ryan is a co-owner of <br />the property and is currently a real estate agent. Sunhi was attacked a couple of months ago in downtown <br />Minneapolis. The Supreme Court ruling talked about hardship cases. Schussler stated in his opinion this <br />is a hardship case given the additional security an attached garage will provide. They are willing to drop <br />their other plans for improving the property until the Supreme Court ruling is changed. <br /> <br />Schussler stated having a home in Minnesota without a garage that was approved years prior would also <br />be a hardship. They would like to live in the great City of Orono but that it is literally impossible to be <br />able to use your property without a garage. The garage would also provide storage space. They are <br />requesting a two-car garage and are willing to forego a patio and a porch in order to obtain the safety that <br />they are seeking. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission voted 2-3 on this application but that in his view there is a fear that the Supreme <br />Court ruling would come down upon the City Council if their application was approved. <br /> <br />Schussler indicated he has lived in Minnesota for over 27 years and has seen Planning Commissions <br />overruled many, many times. Schussler requested the City Council look at their individual situation. <br /> <br />Schussler stated the book, The Speed of Trust, contains a statement by Henry Ford which states the <br />following: “If there is any great secret of success in life, it lives in the ability to put yourself in the other <br />person’s place and to see things from his point of view as well as your own.” Schussler stated he would <br />ask the City Council to put themselves in their position. All they are requesting is a safe place to park <br />their vehicles and access their house. If they r educe the size of the garage, it would result in a one-car <br />garage and they would also need to downsize the size of their car. Schussler stated in his view the <br />reasonableness of the request should also play a part in the Council’s decision. <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 10/25/2010 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 10/11/2010 [Page 6 of 20]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.