My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-25-2010 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2010
>
10-25-2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2015 10:41:18 AM
Creation date
2/24/2012 10:08:16 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 11, 2010 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 12 of 20 <br /> <br />(7. #10-3483 CITY OF ORONO-ZONING AMENDMENT – COLUMBARIUMS , Continued) <br /> <br />also show the topography of the site and the impact on the trees the project would have if it would have to <br />be relocated. The inurnment garden is located at least five feet from any property zoned residential and <br />would not be visible from the adjoining residence. <br /> <br />Owen commented in his view some other verbiage would work and that perhaps the word zoned could be <br />eliminated from the section regarding setbacks to read that this columbarium is located at least five feet <br />from any adjacent property with a nonresidential use or that the columbarium is located at least five feet <br />from any adjacent properties zoned residential having a nonresidential use or zoned nonresidential. <br /> <br />Owen stated he does understand that variances are difficult to approve and that they would appreciate the <br />City Council support. <br /> <br />White noted they will need to table this application until Council Member McMillan is present given the <br />fact that the ordinance change requires a super majority and Council Member Bremer will be abstaining. <br /> <br />Greg Keller, 528 Aspen Circle, Delano, Good Shepherd, indicated he has attended all of the Planning <br />Commission and City Council meetings regarding this issue. Keller pointed out the Planning <br />Commission attempted to make a distinction between above-ground structures and ground level memorial <br />gardens, which in his opinion is a bonafide distinction that should be made. Ground level memorial <br />gardens will have very little impact on adjoining properties. The ordinance lumps above-ground <br />columbaria and ground level gardens together. The word columbaria is derived from a Latin term for an <br />above-ground structure with small compartments for housing doves, which is different than an in-grou nd <br />structure. <br /> <br />Keller stated the Supreme Court decision limits the City Council’s ability to grant variances and that he <br />would recommend the City Council build in some flexibility on the front end. As an example, good <br />drafting technique would dictate that the language not say “the setback shall be,” but rather not less than <br />five feet or not less than ten feet. When this ordinance is reconsidered, Keller stated he would also <br />suggest that all the setbacks for ground level memorial gardens be not less than five feet whether they are <br />adjacent to a residential or commercial property regardless of the zoning. <br /> <br />Keller pointed out that Good Shepherd is not guaranteed they will be given a 5-foot setback and that the <br />City Council could require a different setback. Keller commented there is nothing bad about a 5-foot <br />setback and that the City’s current zoning allows for signs to be set back five feet from property lines, <br />entrance monuments to be set back five feet from property lines; and that boats and unoccupied trailers, <br />terraces, steps, uncovered porches, stoops or similar structures are allowed to be set back two feet from <br />any property line. <br /> <br />Keller encouraged the City Council to look at the broader picture and visit some of the other sites in the <br />area. St. Martin’s and Bethel Methodist memorial gardens have busy county roads. Good Shepherd <br />could duplicate that atmosphere if they were trying to squeeze the garden in at the front of the building, <br />which in their opinion would be a horrible location. Good Shepherd has a quiet, secluded area next to <br />city land that will probably remain a city park longer than the Good Shepherd property will be a church. <br />Keller noted the City’s comprehensive plan proposes that the adjoining land remain a city park. The <br />proposed ordinance also does not address setbacks from roadways. <br /> <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 10/25/2010 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 10/11/2010 [Page 12 of 20]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.