Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 13, 2010 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />PAGE 10 of 14 <br />(10. ADOPT 2011 TAX LEVY AND BUDGET, Continued) <br /> <br />Murphy stated in his view the first preliminary budget should be adopted given Mr. Olson’s statement <br />that a solution needs to be arrived at with the $320,000 shortfall with the police department. Murphy <br />noted the police chief is working on a couple of different options to reduce their budget at the present <br />time. <br /> <br />Bremer indicated she is in agreement with Council Member Murphy and that the $50,000 represents a one <br />percent increase, which is minimal. <br /> <br />Olson stated in all likelihood the union will go to arbitration if the City proposes a zero percent increase <br />with no increase in insurance. Olson stated the costs to go through arbitration will more than likely equal <br />the one percent increase. <br /> <br />Bremer stated she does not want the City to be in a position where they lose staff given the nominal <br />increases and that the employees need to be compensated appropriately, especially given the cut in the <br />Planning Department. <br /> <br />Murphy distributed a 10-year chart depicting the number of city employees and noted the City has done <br />an excellent job in controlling costs over the years. <br /> <br />McMillan commented reducing staff and the number of employees is not always a win/win for the <br />residents and the City. McMillan indicated she is very cognizant of what is going on in the surrounding <br />communities with the economy and that a number of them are proposing a zero percent increase. Local <br />governments need to respond to the needs of the taxpayer given the poor economy. Orono’s tax base is <br />shrinking, which is causing an increased tax levy. McMillan stated it is time that elected officials respond <br />to the needs and cut back wherever possible. <br /> <br />McMillan commented that in her view this year is the year to do a zero percent levy increase and that it is <br />important for the City Council to show the residents that Orono is keeping track of the bottom line. The <br />last thing the residents want now are additional taxes and the City needs to pay attention to that. <br />McMillan stated she would like to keep the level of services as is but keep taxes as low as possible. <br /> <br />Bremer asked if Council Member McMillan understands that she is saying no to an increase in salary for <br />the Staff and a no to an increase in health insurance contributions. <br /> <br />McMillan indicated she does understand that, and noted there was an increase in 2010. <br /> <br />Bremer stated the insurance contributions would go up quite a bit for the individual Staff members <br />without the increase. Bremer stated given the economy, when you have 46 people, you need the best 46 <br />people you can get. When people are let go because of financial reasons, you need 46 employees who are <br />happy with their job and are willing to stay. Bremer stated a one percent increase is not an outlandish <br />increase. <br /> <br />Franchot indicated he is in agreement with Council Member Bremer and that the people who get the <br />opportunities are typically the best people and that the City does need to stay competitive. Franchot <br />stated in his view this conversation is somewhat odd and that he does not understand why the City would <br />not approve the maximum levy in order to retain some flexibility with the budget. Franchot stated in his <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 09/27/2010 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 09/13/2010 [Page 10 of 14]