Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 23, 2010 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 2 of 18 <br /> <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT <br /> <br />*4. #10-3477 JOHN ROEDEL, 4725 NORTH SHORE DRIVE – VARIANCE – DENIAL <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5955 <br /> <br />Franchot moved, McMillan seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5955, a Resolution Denying a <br />Variance from Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1288, for the property located at 4725 North <br />Shore Drive. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br /> <br />5. #10-3483 CITY OF ORONO – AMENDMENT TO RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS <br />TO ALLOW INTERNMENT OF CREMATED REMAINS AS AN ACCESSORY USE TO <br />PLACES OF WORSHIP – REQUEST FOR DIRECTION <br /> <br />Curtis stated this zoning code text amendment would address inurnment or burial of cremated remains at <br />places of worship in residential zoning districts by: <br /> <br />1. Allowing indoor columbaria as an accessory use to a place of worship; <br />2. Allowing outdoor columbaria, ground niches, and direct earth burial with or without an urn that <br /> is accessory to a place of worship with a conditional use permit. <br /> <br />At its August meeting, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the zoning code <br />text amendment to allow inurnment or burial of cremated remains at places of worship in residential <br />zoning districts. The Planning Commission recommended that the conditional use permit take into <br />consideration appropriate setbacks, buffers, and a provision addressing the possibility that the property is <br />no longer a place of worship. <br /> <br />Following the Planning Commission meeting, the City Attorney has indicated that columbaria must be <br />treated no differently than any other nonconforming structure. Absent adopting an Interim Use Permit <br />process, there is no method for requiring the removal of columbarium once the use changes. <br /> <br />Before the Planning Commission made its recommendation, Staff had advised the Commission that it was <br />not necessary to establish setbacks in the code but they could be determined on a case-by-case basis <br />depending on the adjacent land use. Subsequently the City Attorney has advised that setbacks should be <br />established to avoid arbitrariness. <br /> <br />Currently places of worship have a 50-foot building setback. Staff would propose the following <br />minimum setbacks: <br /> <br />1. To provide for screening and separation from adjacent uses, a 10-foot setback from adjacent <br /> property for any part of the columbaria area other than landscaping or a fence/wall (without <br /> niches) of the height otherwise allowed. <br /> <br />2. Structures six feet high or less would be allowed within the remainder of the 50-foot setback. <br /> <br />3. A 50-foot setback for a structure over six feet or a columbarium building. <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 09/13/2010 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 08/23/2010 [Page 2 of 18]