My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-26-2010 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2010
>
07-26-2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:10 PM
Creation date
2/24/2012 10:06:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 12, 2010 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br /> Page 9 of 16 <br /> <br />(6. #10-3472 WELSH SENIOR HOUSING, 875 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, Continued) <br /> <br />Murray stated there will be five 2-bedroom units and that there will be a mix of clientele. At times a <br />relative will move in or an individual will just want the extra space and that it is nice to have the options <br />with the different size units. The smaller and larger units tend to sell out quicker. <br /> <br />McMillan commented she likes the flexibility in the size of the units. <br /> <br />Murphy noted he did not see cooking facilities in the units. <br /> <br />Murray indicated there is a kitchenette type structure within the units, which would include a range and a <br />microwave in the one bedroom units. The studios are designed more for the assisted living and do not <br />contain those items since the residents would be receiving all three meals. A kitchen is also available for <br />those residents who may want to cook a meal periodically. Murray stated they have tended to find that <br />the residents simply do not use the appliances and so they are disconnected to prevent accidents. <br /> <br />Lubben illustrated the construction materials they are proposing to utilize on the exterior of the facility. <br /> <br />Erickson stated Ecumen engaged the services of a qualified market analyst and that this region has been <br />evaluated thoroughly to ensure that they will be providing the appropriate services. That study has also <br />resulted in a number of amenities being incorporated into the building. <br /> <br />Erickson stated he would ask the City Council to reconsider two of the conditions listed in Staff’s report. <br />One is that there is a city code requirement that the private road be paved to a minimum width of 28 feet. <br />Welsh Companies would prefer to avoid that, which would enable them not to encroach closer to the <br />wetland setbacks and avoid adding additional pervious surface. In addition, the 28 foot width leaves the <br />impression of a more intense development. <br /> <br />Welsh Companies has followed the City’s new guidelines for conservation design master plan, which <br />states that they will be using the existing driveway alignment and width in order to minimize additional <br />impervious surface, limit corresponding storm water runoff, and maintain existing drainage patterns. <br />Welsh Companies would like the Council to give some consideration to the 24 feet width they are <br />proposing, particularly in light of the fact that there will be limited on street parking. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if the fire chief has commented on the width of the driveway. <br /> <br />Erickson stated to his knowledge they have not received the comments of the fire chief in relation to that <br />but that they have been given the okay on the clearances for the entrance canopy. <br /> <br />Erickson indicated the second item deals with the park dedication fees and that they would request they <br />be waived for the memory care units since the residents in those units will not be utilizing those park <br />facilities. <br /> <br />White asked what the difference is between preliminary plan approval and concept plan approval. <br /> <br />Mattick stated Welsh Companies is not going through the preliminary plat process because they are going <br />through a concept plan process. This application is not talking about 55 different lots but simply one <br />building with 55-units. <br /> <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 07/26/2010 <br />Approval Council Minutes 07/12/2010 [Page 9 of 16]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.