My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-10-2010 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2010
>
05-10-2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2015 2:47:06 PM
Creation date
2/24/2012 10:05:20 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 26, 2010 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />Page 10 of 15 <br />(7. ORONO 2010-2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE, Continued) <br /> <br />White commented that the City Council cannot delay formal action on the Comprehensive Plan much <br />longer and that once the process is started, it will give the Council a chance to focus on what it will really <br />mean in reality. The City will get to choose how developments should be allowed. White noted the <br />traffic situation in Navarre is not something that the City really can deal with since it is a county road but <br />that they have prevented the roads from becoming a major freeway which will attract even more people. <br />White stated if the road is widened through Navarre, the traffic would double. <br /> <br />McMillan stated given the sheet that was distributed by Mike Gaffron, she is unsure whether she can <br />make a decision on the plan tonight. McMillan stated if the City has the opportunity to reduce density <br />somewhat, she would be in favor of looking at analysis over the next two weeks and revisit it at the next <br />council meeting. McMillan stated in her view the high density goes against everything Orono believes in <br />and that the City Council should take their time on it and make sure it is exactly the way they want it. <br />Once the land is reguided, there is an expectation that is set, and the City Council should be comfortable <br />with the proposed density. <br /> <br />Bremer asked if there is a deadline. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated the City is past the deadline and that two weeks probably would not make a difference <br />to the Metropolitan Council but that it cannot be delayed for another two months. <br /> <br />Franchot stated he would like to move forward even though he understands Council Member McMillan’s <br />position. Franchot noted the City still retains a lot of authority to dictate how the development will <br />happen. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the Comprehensive Plan lays out a future of high density and that the Council needs to <br />be very sure about it. McMillan stated she does not know why the City Council has to approve it tonight <br />given its importance. McMillan indicated she appreciated the citizens’ input and that they have tried to <br />condense the process into this past month and that another two weeks would be appropriate. McMillan <br />reiterated she would like more time to review the information provided by Planner Gaffron. <br /> <br />Murphy moved, Franchot seconded, to approve the requested changes for the reguiding of 3245 <br />Wayzata Boulevard, and to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5929, a Resolution Granting Preliminary <br />Approval of the Orono 2010-2030 Community Management Plan. <br /> <br />Gaffron asked if the City is going to allow reguiding of the Eisinger property and approve the Klingelhutz <br />property addition, but not approve any changes to the fire station site, not remove the Mud and bowling <br />alley site, and not approve any other requested changes. <br /> <br />Murphy stated it is his understanding that they are not approving any of the latest corrections or changes <br />and that they are adopting what is proposed. <br /> <br />McMillan reiterated that there is no reason to rush this and that the Council was given some information <br />tonight to help guide them on how density could be reduced and still meet the Metropolitan Council <br />requirements and it is worth another two weeks to think about it. <br /> <br />Bremer asked what would happen to Area F, 2525 Shadywood. <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 05/10/2010 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 04/26/2010 [Page 10 of 15]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.