My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-2010 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
02-22-2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2015 11:31:23 AM
Creation date
2/24/2012 10:03:47 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 8, 2010 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 4 of 20 <br /> <br />(5. #10-3441 MADALYN J. EPPLE, TRUSTEE, 3625 EILEEN STREET, Continued) <br /> <br />Mattick indicated he did speak with the attorney for the trust today and that an affidavit needs to be filed <br />to update the trustee on the certificate of title. Once that is completed, the agreement can be signed. <br /> <br />Murphy asked why the City would grant a waiver of the fee. <br /> <br />Turner stated the applicants feel this should have been taken care of by the developer at the time the lot <br />was created. <br /> <br />Murphy asked whether Staff feels the fee should be waived. <br /> <br />Turner stated in her view the applicant does have a good point but that Staff does have some time into this <br />application and that the City Attorney also has spent some time on the application in drafting the <br />agreement. <br /> <br />Bremer asked how much time City Attorney Mattick has spent on this application. <br /> <br />Mattick indicated his office has approximately two hours of time in on the application. <br /> <br />Madalyn Epple stated this situation has been confusing and has required some time on their part to <br />straighten out. <br /> <br />White asked how much the fee would be on this application. <br /> <br />Turner stated the typical application fee is $700 and that normally the City Attorney’s fees would also be <br />passed on to the applicant. <br /> <br />Murphy asked why Ms. Epple brought the application to the City. <br /> <br />Epple indicated they would like to sell the property and need to have the situation cleared up. <br /> <br />Bremer indicated she would be in favor of waiving the City’s portion of the fee but that the applicant <br />should be responsible for the City Attorney’s costs. <br /> <br />Bremer moved, Franchot seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5914, a Resolution Approving the <br />Division of Tax Parcel 05-117-23-24-0039, and Amending the Approval of Riedel Company Stubbs <br />Bay Addition, with the City’s portion of the fee being waived and the City Attorney’s costs being <br />paid by the applicant. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays <br /> <br /> <br />6. #10-3442 THE EMILY PROGRAM, 2180 NORTH SHORE DRIVE – CONDITIONAL <br />USE PERMIT <br /> <br />Dirk Miller, Applicant, was present. <br /> <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 02/22/2010 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 02/08/2010 [Page 4 of 20]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).